• FrankTheHealer@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The man speaking in this clip is Nilay Patel. Hes the Editor in Chief at The Verge.

    He also used to be a lawyer before moving to journalism full time. So he knows Bullshit when he sees it.

    I used to think that The Verge were just a bunch of Apple zealots who couldn’t even do a pc build video properly. They’ve come along way since then. Reddit would be absolutely insane to try and take on something like The Verge.

    Side note , Nilay also has a podcast called Decoder where he interviews the heads of companies to get an idea of how they run and what their goals are. Its a pretty good show and I reccomend it. The one where Nilay takes on the head of Substack was hilarious

  • scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The Verge has been covering the shit out of the Reddit death spiral and I’m so here for it. Good for them.

    • SpezCanLigmaBalls@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      For real. My brother is one of those people who is like “they aren’t gonna die from this so why should I care blah blah blah”. He thinks if protesting won’t have the immediate impact that people want then those no reason for it to happen

  • memex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can anyone explain to me, please, how is this good (financially) for the reddit investors? I mean, I ran from reddit since I only accessed it from sync. Didn’t really care for the ‘politics’. Now I get here and see there’s a lot more to it than just the shut down of 3rd party apps (which I understood as a financial decision). If money’s the motivation for all of this, how is it financially healthy?

  • n2burns@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    We’ll no longer comment on hearsay, unsubstantiated claims, or baseless accusations from The Verge. We’ll be in touch as corrections are needed.

    Setting aside the ridiculousness of this position, the statement also doesn’t make sense at face value, right? I think I understand what they’re trying to say, but aren’t those two sentences in conflict? Isn’t getting “in touch as corrections are needed” literally making “comment on hearsay, unsubstantiated claims, or baseless accusations”?