• ThePantser@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    97
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Why connect to the Internet with it then. The browser could just make everything up on the fly.

    Got questions about a medication?

    Maybe you want to check up on some disease symptoms?

    AI can make something that sounds vaguely plausible.

    • BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Browsing the internet will be like playing AI Quake II, you’ll think you are in this alternate universe.

  • orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    OpenAI is like a zombie stumbling around trying to infect everything. We shove it away because it’s fuckin’ gross and we want nothing to do with it, while the bosses that reanimated it are like “well fuck, we made this thing, we have to use it for something.”

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Mozilla spinning off control of its development to an independent group the way they did with Thunderbird would be the best thing that could happen to Firefox.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Thunderbird :

      Operated by MZLA Technologies Corporation, a subsidiary of the Mozilla Foundation, Thunderbird is an independent, community-driven project that is managed and overseen by the Thunderbird Council, which is elected by the Thunderbird community.

      Chrome self-destructing because of stupidity like AI would only ever manage to be a close second, at best.

      • exu@feditown.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Some of their I initiatives are good, like the built-in local translation tool we now have.

        • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Also their initiative to recognise images and generate alt-text for screen-reader users.

          My sister is blind and screen readers are close to useless on the web, so it was great to hear Mozilla is working on that.

        • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Considering how little they invest into their core product compared to all the other shit and how much money the top brass earns despite declining market share, I don’t think they’re hurting for money that much.

          • doodledup@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 hours ago

            They are investing a lot in their core product. Problem is that you can’t really monatize it. You want Firefox to be paywalled?

            • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Ideally it would be financed by user donations. Probably not that realistic for a project like this, though.

              • doodledup@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 minutes ago

                You can’t finance a massive project like that with donations. This isn’t like Signal or some small project like that. Firefox is MASSIVE.

              • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Yeah, web browsers cost hundreds of millions per year to maintain, they’re mind-bogglingly complicated and costly.

                I’d really hope the Linux Foundation would help contribute towards the budget, but LF is quite pro Chromium.

                I don’t think end users can even come close to funding Firefox development, unfortunately.

  • 11111one11111@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    10 hours ago

    How the fuck would this be more cost effective than them making their own chrome based browser and not be a demonstration of their over inflated operating costs and company valuation?

    If you are paying for a service that is charging you enough to allow them to buy the most widly used browser from a company whose business model is to monopolize data, then maybe you’re paying them a titbit more than what the service they’re providing is worth.

    • MysticKetchup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I’m sure they’re less interested about buying Chrome than they are about buying Chrome’s market share

        • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          The sheer market share that forces websites develop for chrome for maximum visibility, to force websites to allow their content to be scraped to be usable by the average user.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      What allows them to buy chrome is ridiculous investment money, not what they’re charging. From what I read, I think they’re still running a loss because required processing power is still just so insanely ridiculous for AI.