You better not use any words he uses. /s Braindead argument.

I’ve written an article about my opinions on the topic. The Opium of the Labels: How Woke Moralism Serves Capital

There it is—when the name-calling fails, just double down on it. You’ve got nothing but labels and hostility, which is exactly why working people don’t take you seriously.

Classic—no argument, just name-calling. You’ve called me a homophobe and now a racist in under an hour without a single quote to back it up. This lazy labeling is exactly why working people tune out and drift right. And btw, the fascists are the ones who disregard words and choose violence instead—maybe you’re the fascist here. How do you like my virtue signaling?

I agree that queer and marginalized workers face unique and heightened exploitation under capitalism—that’s a material reality I don’t dispute—but my point is that you’re treating these struggles as separate from class rather than interwoven with it, and by demanding absolute ideological conformity on every social issue as a prerequisite for solidarity, you’re fracturing the very working-class unity needed to fight the system that exploits all of us; the goal isn’t to ignore specific oppressions but to build a broad coalition where we can disagree on tactics and phrasing while still recognizing our shared enemy, because without that unity, we’re just fighting each other while capital wins.

You’re proving my point by framing this as a binary choice—either adopt your specific brand of identity politics or be a bigot—and that’s not dialectics, it’s gatekeeping that ignores the actual class struggle while you police my language instead of focusing on material exploitation like child labor or wage slavery that affects all workers regardless of identity; solidarity isn’t built on purity tests, it’s built on shared economic interest, and when you alienate workers for not using perfect phrasing, you’re just shrinking the tent until it only fits your clique while the real world burns under capitalism.

Did that really work with Hogwarts Legacy? I remember people buying multiple copies just to spite the boycott. If you push harder with this kind of moral absolutism, you’re not building solidarity—you’re creating backlash. The more you label and exclude, the more you hand ammunition to the far-right. That’s not class consciousness; that’s performative purity testing that alienates the very people we need to organize.

Morgan Freeman: if you want to get rid of racism just stop talking about it.

Proving my point: Your divisive rhetoric pushes the working class toward fascism by ignoring material conditions for identity politics. Do you care about child labor exploitation, or just labels? You’re a bourgeois moralist who doesn’t care about exploitation—just virtue-signaling. You derail discussions towards imperialist talking points rather than focus on what’s important.

Opposing transphobia is class solidarity. Dividing the working class by excluding marginalized voices only weakens us all.

Could you be more specific? Because to me it feels like you are just making up stuff.

The CIA Document That Predicted Wokism (1985)

There goes another ‘leftist’ virtue-signaling, doing the job of three-letter agencies by creating division among the people.

Class reductionism is bad, actually.

As opposed to?

I think this is exactly what I’m saying. If queer people are persecuted it’s class violence against the working class. So labeling it any other way only serves the interests of the bourgeois who wants us divided.

When have I done that? Stop making stuff up.

I did.

China’s block of LGBTQ+ tag on Steam fights Western identity politics that split the working class. With US capital pivoting to fascism, Beijing protects proletarian unity. Class struggle, not labels. #Marxism #AntiImperialism

The Strategic Blockade of Bourgeois Identity Politics and the Collapse of Imperialist “Woke” Capital
Steam’s LGBTQ+ Label Blocked in China — The Class Analysis

The anger toward AI is a class-conscious reaction to its use under capitalism: it’s a tool for deskilling work, centralizing wealth, automating surveillance, and devouring energy and water while the planet burns. The scraping of creative works for private profit is a new enclosure of the commons, and the flood of disinformation and slop serves imperialist interests, not working people. The science isn’t the enemy—the capitalist relations that shape its deployment are. A socialist society could put such forces to collective use, but until then, skepticism is a measured response to a technology wielded as a weapon of class power.

I believe the amount you get from placing them vertical is negligible.

I just heard it on “Michael Parenti - The JFK Assassination: The Gangster Nature of the State”

I’m posting on a forum, not a wiki, I’m not going to put more than a few minutes of work on a post. Fuck off and go bother someone else.