Does having an AirBNB setup make someone deserving of the guillotine or does that only apply to owners of multiple houses? What about apartments?

Please explain your reasoning as well.

  • WalrusDragonOnABike [they/them]@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    If you are owning houses just to use them as AIRBNBs, yes. Profiting off of artificial scarcity and already having money is bad. Being wealthy doesn’t mean you deserve to be more wealthy.

      • Kovukono@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        49
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I’m lucky enough to have been financially able to buy a home. I had help making the down payment, but we’ve now got a 30 year mortgage. My monthly payments are less than what I was paying for rent, less than the average rent in the city by almost a third. I got this place with two above-average incomes, and had the good fortune to get it during the COVID housing and interest rate dip, and I still needed extra help.

        If someone is stuck with renting, they’re likely paying more than they would for a mortgage. They can’t save up the money because they’re already lagging behind, and the housing market isn’t coming down in price, and wages absolutely aren’t keeping pace. No one is saying a house would “lock them down,” they’re pointing out they can never afford it because they can’t even come up with the money to show the bank they can save because they’re already paying above the potential mortgage payments every month.

        But you’re saying they won’t, not can’t, so what should they do to come up with the money? Start selling kidneys? 78% of Americans live paycheck to paycheck, and that same link shows 71% have less than $2000 in their savings. So where exactly are people supposed to shit out your hypothetical $30,000?

        • SkippingRelax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          7 months ago

          Fellow home-owner, not a landlord. Not in the US but I think things are comparable.

          Your mortgage repayments are less than what you were paying in rent, okay. However, do you feel that is a reasonable comparison?

          Do you pay some sort of insurance? Property and or council taxes, rubbish removal, water and other things that you probably didn’t even know existed before becoming a home owner?

          Do you know that your roof has and average life span of 30 years? Unless yours is new, you’ll need to start thinking about it at some point, and it can be pricey, together with all the rest of planned and unplanned maintenance that comes with owning a place.

          Not really defending everything the person you are replying to said, but I think this topic too often gets simplified to monthly rent vs monthly mortgage repayments.

          • Kovukono@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            7 months ago

            Even with the added costs of owning the home and upkeep, it’s only equivalent or just above rent, and that’s with the condo association fees and insurance. Even while renting I was stuck paying for utilities. And I’m highly aware that the roof needs replacing, given that we’ve got to replace ours within 5 years.

            But if your point is “owning a home is more expensive than renting when you factor in all extra costs,” I want to again point out that most people are barely able to stay afloat. His point was that anyone can buy a house. Mine is that the money he thinks grows on trees literally does not exist for the majority of people.

            • SkippingRelax@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              Fair enough, my point was more that people that just assume that mortgage payment is X and is less than rent therefore I’m am being robbed aren’t looking at the whole picture, or aren’t being honest.

          • howrar@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            7 months ago

            Rent has to account for all of that too, plus labour costs and profit for the landlord. Unless the landlord is charitably handing out free money, there’s no world in which owning is more expensive than renting on average for an equivalent property.

      • howrar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        45
        ·
        7 months ago

        You can show the bank that you’ve never missed a rent payment, yet still be unable to get a mortgage whose monthly payments are less than rent because you don’t have enough saved for a downpayment. That’s a “can’t”, not a “won’t”.

        • rdyoung@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          We had a solution to this problem and the banks went and fucked it up and with it our economy.

      • otp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        7 months ago

        Then we have the whole “fuckcars” movement, who wants everyone crammed into a shared-wall sardine can and nobody to own a house of their own ever; for the sake of population density so they can bike everywhere.

        Lol what?

        I’m pro fuckcars despite the fact that I know they have a place.

        It has nothing at all to do with not owning a house or a home. As well, not everyone has to live in the city. But cities should be made with people in mind and the infrastructure should be there for people to get around cities without the need for everyone to own a car.

        Besides. Less car-centric design also means less traffic!

      • kakes@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        7 months ago

        Not everyone can buy a house, because of greedy people using housing as a driver of profits. There are a growing mass of people out there that will simply never make enough to own a property where they live. For some people, renting is not a choice - its the only option.

        Also: you are completely and utterly missing the entire point of c/fuckcars.

        • gusgalarnyk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Ya, seriously, their take is crazy. I’m a two income household, both software engineers, and to save enough money to afford the loan to buy the home would take us years. The cost of a mortgage right now is higher than my rent by a huge percentage and that still requires 20-30k of down payment.

          Could we downsize to a 1 bedroom apartment, eat PBJs every night, and stick to cheap hobbies such that we could afford to start the loan in two years or something - yes. But why am I required to trade my youth for the ability to pay the bank the better part of a million dollars over the next 20 years of my life just so I can install a nice bathroom and AC and maintain the flat properly.

      • squid_slime@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Living in a house share 4 years ago giving my god awful landlord over half my paycheck from full time employment as a cafe manager meant I was unable to save.

        Your out of touch