Just wondered what people are using for their password management.

I’m currently using 1Password on a family subscription for both password management and 2FA (and then Authy for the 1Password 2FA). But I’m seeing a lot more posters — particularly since joining Lemmy — championing BitWarden (either cloud or self hosted) and Raivo OTP as a cheaper, almost-as-functional alternative.

So is it worth the switch? Will I lose out on anything by doing so?

I’m currently running BitWarden with a free account to see if I can live with it. But I must admit, 1Password is a staple app for me and one that I would say is priceless to my workflow and setup.

Just interested in your thoughts and trying to stimulate conversation!

    • protput@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Jup bitwarden is pretty awesome! I use a self hosted vaultwarden. You can link it with the bitwarden browser extensions.

        • FarLine99@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I feel way more comfortable with having this one file than relying on some cloud-someone-computer thing. And experience is smooth thanks to Syncthing.

    • WhoisJohnGalt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Question for you since you mentioned how it’s integrated with all your devices. I currently do not use a PW manager (I know, shame on me). Let’s say I get bitwarden, do I need to go back and change every password on every website to the bitwarden-generated password?

      It just seems like I’m “In too deep” in a way where it’ll be a pain in the ass to set up.

      • flurry@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you have stored your credentials in your browser, you can export them to Bitwarden. It’s fairly easy and will save you a lot of time.

        The point of using Bitwarden (or any password manager) is that you have no idea what your password is. From a security pov you « should » update your credentials but no need to rush, one step a time 👍🏼

        • DeriHunter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I started using bitwarden half a year ago and this is what I did. But once again moved, I Figured it worth nothing if I have weak and shared passwords across apps and sites. so eagrly I changed all the password on accounts that hold my financing details (bank, google, PayPal, etc…) and then lazily, every time I had to go to a site like lemmy for instance I changed it on the way

      • else@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        When I switched to bitwarden I updated my password to a more secure (bitwarden-generated) password each time I logged into a site and stored it on bitwarden. Painless. That’s how I got better passwords across the board and incrementally moved over to bitwarden.

      • BaumGeist@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Are you forced to? No. Should you anyway? Yes. I did what @else@lemmy.fmhy.ml said: just change them when you login. That way it doesn’t feel like a grand undertaking, and you still end up with extremely secure passwords that you don’t have to remember.

        Also, i recommend generating your master password. If my senior mom staring down the barrel of alzheimers can remember a 12-digit string of random characters (after emptying out all the space wasted by a few dozen passwords), you can too

      • timidgoat@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I felt the same as you. Here’s how I managed to deal with my piles of accounts: get BitWarden set up, and pick a few main accounts to enter in and generate new passwords for. Delete your login data and cookies from your browser, then add accounts to BitWarden and generate new passwords as you come to need them. That way it’s one at a time not all at once. Made it manageable for me! (BitWarden even prompts you if you’d like to save a login if it’s never seen it before)

      • PeddlingAmbiguity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You can just add your current passwords to bitwarden, no need to change any passwords if you don’t want. It actually takes less effort than you might think. Just add your username and password each time you need to login to something and everything will be added pretty quickly.

    • BaumGeist@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      FYI privacytools[.]io has long been commandeered by the BDFL who apparently accepts—how do i put this impartially?—financial incentives for supporting specific software.

      Privacyguides.org is the version maintained by the original privacytools team that have been doing the lion’s share of the work since 2019

      • flurry@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        There’s a huge drama between privacytools and privacyguide, I’m not sure anyone here can tell what happened internally after reading both side of the story.

        Yes privacy tools accept sponsoring but it should be transparent about it ? It was the case before, I’m not using the site anymore so idk if things have changed in a bad way I’m sorry I promoted it.

    • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      +1 for Bitwarden, have used it for years. In general, always go open source, especially for privacy / security tools.

  • HollowNotion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 year ago

    Odd seeing so many people prefer Bitwarden specifically for the polish and UI. Those are the reasons I chose 1Password. Both work! Both are actually pretty good solutions. But after using Bitwarden for quite a while for work, I set up 1Pass for my personal stuff. It’s just nicer and easier to manage, imo, even as a tech savvy user.

    • schmurnan@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      And this is why I love places like Lemmy. Balanced, different opinions 🙂

      I personally have no issues with 1Password (except that v8 is Electron), but just tempted to try the alternatives given how strong a following Bitwarden appears to have.

      Either way… it’s good to have options.

      • HollowNotion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        For sure. I set my father up on Bitwarden because he gets a lot more out of the free tier, and it’s hard enough to convince him he needs a password manager, let alone one that costs anything, lol.

  • Lunch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ive used both, Bitwarden feels more mature plus it’s open source. But 1Password is probably more user friendly for less tech savvy people.

    • schmurnan@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thanks. I’m tech savvy so that’s not a problem. Just always used 1Password based on recommendations. More than happy to go open source, and 1Password 8 feels like a step backwards from 1Password 7.

      • sennmood@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just out of curiosity, why exactly is it a step back? I’ve heard this comment several times but, having only used 1Password 8 (which I quite like), I have nothing to compare it to.

        • schmurnan@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Because it’s now an Electron app on macOS and — in my personal view — Electron apps suck. Much prefer native apps.

          Functionality-wise it’s the same, but just doesn’t feel as nice to use, if that makes sense.

          • sennmood@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Fair enough, to each their own. I understand why electron apps might not be everyone’s cup of tea, but I think some really do work very well (VSCode is the standout).

            • schmurnan@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Now you may have me there. Visual Studio Code is certainly an exception, I’d be willing to admit.

            • schmurnan@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s personal preference of course. This article may explain it better than I ever could (might not be the best source, was just a quick DDG search).

              • JackbyDev@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’ve never understood those problems. I’m not saying they don’t exist, I haven’t investigated it or anything lol, but I don’t see why individual non-electron programs have less overhead than individual electron programs when the argument is that multiple would-be electron apps could share one browser instance because multiple non-electron apps also don’t share anything.

                Also I don’t see how not using a chromium base would make programs better about having massive 1 GB directories of various temp files.

                What am I missing? Because clearly those problems exist.

                • schmurnan@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I can’t say I fully understand the ins and outs of it because, like you, I’ve never looked into it in any great detail.

                  I’ve used VS Code for a while and I remember seeing a post on Reddit about how good it is “for an Electron app”, which raised my interest. I then saw more and more complaints about Electron apps, mainly around how they consume a lot of resource and ultimately crash peoples machines, resulting in data loss.

                  Don’t get me wrong, I see the benefits of Electron apps — they’re easy to deploy across multiple OSes which makes things a lot easier for developers. But I guess as a macOS user, I do love a native app for its look and feel and user experience. Not knocking that on all Electron apps, it’s just a preference.

      • i11@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree that 1password 8 is a step backwards when they switched to electron from native app on Mac. I’m still sticking on 1password 7 because of that.

      • Lunch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I feel the same. I therefore use Bitwarden myself(not selfhosted as I don’t trust myself to host important things quite yet), and control 1Password for the rest of the fam.

  • iesou@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I recommend KeePass, used it for years, open source, not hosted, can use a key file for added security and works well with nextcloud, drive, Dropbox, etc

  • bloodninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If your workflow is how you like it I would stay.

    Vaultwarden might be worth looking into when you have time or want to set it up to check it out. Self-hosted Bitwarden compatible server written in Rust. Lets you store OTP for free which is a convenience I enjoy.

    • schmurnan@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Will definitely look into Vaultwarden. Always looking for containers I can add to my stack!

  • Aielman15@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve used BitWarden for a few years now and I really like it. I’ve set it up on both my PC and phone browsers, and it does its job well. Never paid anything for it, the free tier is generous enough for casual users like me.

    It being open source sold it for me.

  • DrTautology@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    KeePass is great. Has all the features I want and then some. Everything is stored locally, you can encrypt with password and private keys and it even has the ability to sync dabases on a on a home server. I use it on windows and android. Since 99% of the time I make password updates on my phone I’ll just sftp the database file to my server and then use it to sync with my windows machine next time I’m on it.

    • NimbleSloth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I also use KeePass. Been using it for 2-3 years now. No complaints. Like you said, it has all the features I need and then some.

    • flyoverstate@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      What’s the advantage of sftp over something like synching to automatically keep it updated on all your devices?

      • DrTautology@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well I own and manage the server for one thing, so it makes sense for me. Considering the sensitivity of this I try to keep as much of it as possible under my direct control. I only have three devices that I need all of my passwords on, and with KeePass you just click the drop-down and select the sync option when you need to update. I have an sftp client on my phone and will just upload the database whenever I need to. There is an auto syncing option on the client, but I don’t use it. It’s definitely not the most convenient option out there, but good security is rarely convenient.

  • CaptObvious@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I use Bitwarden after trying out several recommended alternatives. It’s what works best for me and my workflow (individual personal and work use). The browser extension is a lifesaver.

    I remember trying 1Password and deciding against it for some reason, but I don’t remember what. My overall impression now is that it was a fine product, but Bitwarden was a better fit. I’d say use whichever meets your needs.

  • bighi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    1Password is way better, but it’s more expensive and not open source.

    Bitwarden is, like most open source apps, jankier than 1Password. Not as mature. But people that care a lot about their software being open source will use it because it’s the best open source option we have at the moment.

    None of them is a bad app.

    • Bazoogle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Way better” is an exaggeration in my mind. It may have a few nicer things here and there, but name one thing 1Pass can do that Bitwarden can’t? It certainly has a different UI, but I definitely preferred this over my former LastPass account.

      • bighi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This “what can one do that the other can’t” is never a good argument. Specially against someone that was talking about quality.

        A horse and a 2023 Lamborghini can do the same things, transport-wise. But that doesn’t mean that the quality is the same.

    • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      More expensive and closed source

      vs

      free or cheaper subscription, can even be self hosted and open source

      I’ll pick the later

      • bighi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, each one with their choices. I have the income to pay for better quality, so I use 1Password. But you can’t go wrong with any of those two.

  • dinckel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been subscribed to 1Password for around 8 years now, and don’t intend to cancel it any time. It’s super convenient, updated frequently, and seems to be audited independently to ensure security too. Just recently they’ve added a few features that make my life as a developer with multiple machines so much easier. OTP on every logged in device too, so I don’t need to constantly migrate the horrible Authy setups, or whatever else people use

    • einsteinx2@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah the ssh-agent was something I didn’t know I wanted until they added it. Now it’s so nice not having to generate new ssh keys and update all my severs and VMs every time I set up a new machine, and if/when I need to rotate keys, I only have to update one.