Its government has been criticised for failing to provide enough shelter to thousands of people seeking asylum.
The Belgian government has imposed a ban on providing shelter for single men seeking asylum, arguing its insufficient reception capacity should be freed for families, women and children first.
Belgium has long come under criticism for failing to provide enough shelter to the thousands of people who are seeking protection from persecution in their home countries. Long lines of tents along streets outside the main processing centre in Brussels have become a stain on Belgium’s reputation.
On Wednesday, Asylum State Secretary Nicole de Moor said increasing pressure on asylum housing was expected over the coming months and she “absolutely wants to avoid” children ending up on the streets this winter. Instead, single men will have to fend for themselves.
The move was met with scathing criticism from human rights organisations.
“We thought we’d seen it all, but no. The Belgian government isn’t just sitting on human rights. It’s burying them by ‘suspending’ the reception of single male asylum seekers,” said Philippe Hensmans, director of Amnesty International Belgium.
De Moor said an influx of asylum seekers over the past two years in the nation of 11.5 million people had filled the shelter centres to near capacity of 33,500.
Last year, Belgium had nearly 37,000 applications for protection, said Fedasil, the federal agency responsible for receiving asylum seekers.
On top of the asylum seekers, Belgium is also providing help to about 62,000 Ukrainian refugees.
Last year alone, labour courts convicted Fedasil more than 5,000 times for failing to provide proper shelter.
Still, de Moor said, “our country has already done more than its share for a long time,” and she called on other EU nations to increase their efforts instead.
In December, Europe’s top human rights body urged Belgian authorities to provide better assistance to asylum seekers after hundreds of people slept on Brussels streets in freezing temperatures.
The Council of Europe’s commissioner for human rights said a lack of available spots in reception facilities was damaging asylum seekers’ rights to health and other basic needs.
Source: The Associated Press
So much for equality
dont worry the women and children are next. this is just a slow way to decrease the number of refugees. all they are doing is tapping into the apathy society has for men.
It has nothing to do with that, it’s just another excuse to take in as few people as possible and treating the ones who do get in as shit.
Belgium: breaches human rights of vulnerable asylum seekers in a completely alien country
random lemmitors: “but why are they only doing it to men? Hmmmmm…
seems like the feminist agenda to me”tapping into the apathy society has for men
The more time I spend on Lemmy the more I realize just how many people simply don’t understand how to read.
Cherrypicking seems to be a thing amongst you people. Quick question, are you in a STEM field?
ITT: people managing to be simultaneously racist and misogynistic
Could you not put up 4 men in family housing temporarily?
Of course you could, but it isn’t about finding viable solutions (never mind address the root causes), the cruelty is the point.
also to just say no to asylum seekers in the near future.
Great way to incentivate women trafficking, the under age wives pricing in countries migrating to Belgium will go bonker now that one is needed to request asylum /s
That’s how you make people hate women, you know - by constantly treating them better just because they are women.
I get prioritising children, so I’m all for providing for families with children first. But a single man, single woman or a couple without children? All equal in my eyes.
Edit: Also lol at flexing 62,000 Ukrainian refugees. We have some 320,000 with a slightly smaller population than Belgium.
deleted by creator
I’m talking about gender based discrimination. Change the genders and everyone loses their shit. Discriminate against men and all’s fine and peachy.
deleted by creator
And that’s why women still can’t vote to this day, they just said “it is what it is” and left it at that.
You didn’t support your point. The one case this summer is devastating, but not indicative that they contribute generally to more crime. There’s a real problem with trying to collect that information, because you run into the same problem the US has. Black people have more criminal charges against them than white people, at large. That’s because police target them. I don’t know about Norway, but given that you specified “non-European,” I’ll assume that there’s a discrimination aspect.
Male asylum seekers are a real problem and are over represented in crime. Just this summer a 13 year old girl was gang raped by five (5) non European asylum seekers in our little town.
If the point you’re trying to make is that they are over-represented in crime statistics then it would have been better to cite those statistics instead of one singular incident.
I can see a surge of female transgender people seeking asylum…
but providing shelter to ukrainian driving Jaguar or Audi Q7, welcome!
