• Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    4 months ago

    Why only 4 years? The fairphone 5 is water resistant and has a replacable battery. The Samsung Galaxy S5 was fully waterproof and had a replacable battery.

      • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        IP68 didn’t exist when the galaxy S5 came out. The fairphone has a replaceable screen and is made by a tiny company that doesn’t have the budget for full waterproof testing. Often phones will have waterproofing but will not spend the money for the expensive testing for certification, see: Pocophone, etc.

        • 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          4 months ago

          Well then I like my phones a little bit more expensive then since they’re certified. Gives me peace of mind.

          • FireWire400@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            I mean, it still ultimately means nothing if it’s not covered by warranty.

            The Sony Xperia phones back in the day were literally advertised as being able to “live underwater”; was there any guarantee that it wouldn’t just die in a light shower? lol no

          • BigBrainBrett2517@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            I like how you keep getting down voted even though you have made it clear that it’s your own personal choice/bias and acknowledge it’s not for everyone.

            I agree both options would be good 👍