• chk232@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Joined yesterday, Elon boi going down a right wing rabbithole and the zucc-verse is not very appetizing.

  • MyOpinion@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Mastodon is the most stable social network I have used in a long time. Love it!

  • Sl00k@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is great! But generally can’t see Mastadon overtaking any other major social platforms until it introduces an equivalent of For you feed from Twitter. The days of following specific people and hashtags is over, it’s tedious and I don’t give a shit about 3/4s of the feed.

    2017-2020 Twitter was absolutely peak Twitter algorithm wise and thousands of users want that exact experience back, yet nobody will provide it.

    • Venomnik0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Advertising requires money. Its a slippery slope that’ll lead us down the same path as Reddit again. We’re better than that.

    • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The fediverse isn’t driven by profit, so growth for the sake of growth isn’t necessary. Word of mouth will let the fediverse platforms grow naturally and sustainably

      • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It would be a mistake to not realise that they operate in the same virtual space as profit driven corporations though. They should still be professionally run with proper pr and marketing. Whether that is volunteer led, or alternative funding like Wikipedia or charging corporate clients etc.

        Personally, I’d like corporate integration to fund the free part, but with no additional benefit. Just the same access that private users get for free. Otherwise it’s a slippery slope.

        Hard to regulate though. How woukd you verify, who would verify? Could be like fair trade products, whereby there is a certifying body. User instances could decide to only federate with corporate instances that are registered with this non profit. They would pay for their access, like Reddit is asking from their apps, except actually reasonable costs. This could be disbursed to large instances with over X amounts of users to fund their computing needs.

    • Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think there’s any advertising budget being spent on these fedi platforms, which makes it impressive they’ve grown so much from media exposure and word of mouth.

  • PreciousPig@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is it recommended to create an account specifically for Mastodon or just use your Lemmy-account? Will it fuck up my feeds/subs in some way if I only use one account for both? (I’m new to the whole fediverse thing)

    • PCH@geddit.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d have a separate Maston and Lemmy. Because they present differently. And are different systems for the most part.

  • snor10@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wow, two million users, congratulations Mastodon!

    Threads is at 100 million, so if they federate they will still be completely drowned out.

    • MyFairJulia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If i remember correctly, Threads just uses your pre-existing Instagram account so 108 million is a veeeery theoretical number. We will see how many users actually move to Threads and whether our instances don’t block Threads instances.

    • chakan2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Threads has 100m phantom accounts. A lot of them are bots. Who knows how many of those are real users.

    • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, it would best to compare apples to apples, there are 8M total Mastodon accounts to 108M Threads accounts.

      For active users if we assume the same active ratio (probably not, but I couldn’t find any data for Threads on that from a 1 minute search), then it would be 2 million to 27 million, which is small but it wouldn’t “completely” drown out Mastodon.

    • jdh@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      And our communities will remain strong. The people growing and caring for a free and open Internet will always be here as the minority to large corporations and lowest common denominators of society.

      I believe it was the official mastodon blog that compared Meta advising xmpp the way they’ll abuse the fediverse but we will stand strong.

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Threads created a shadow account for every user on Instagram, so, I dunno. I’m guessing most of those are just dummy accounts that will remain forever inactive.