• Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    God I’m exhausted.

    At this point, we just need to cut it all off completely. Oil shipments, electricity, lumber, aluminum. All of it.

    I know that that’s a hard ask for those industries that are affected, and if it means the federal goverment has to temporarily raise the deficit in order to subsidize those industries it’ll be crazy expensive and inflation will shoot up. But I’m convinced that that would be only a short amount of time that that would actually be needed.

    Let the United States go one week without our stuff. 100%…fuck 'em. They’ll last one week. Maybe two. And when they quit their bullshit, make it clear that we are diversifying our business partners making it easier to pull it from them again anytime they let Trump open is fucking mouth.

    Hold our resources hostage against them.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      I mean, if we play all our cards at once, we have no cards left for the next thing, and in the process that might raise enough American political to invade for real.

      It should be and I think is all on the table, though, and I have no problem with it if they want to escalate, because we also need to raise political will to sever our ties for good.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 hours ago

        we have no cards left for the next thing,

        That’s the game, he’s bleeding you for cards.

        If he’s going to attack you, he’ll bleed you first. There is no appeasing him permanently.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          We have a deep deck (which is part of why playing the whole thing at once would be kinda nutty). Like every day someone mentions a new way to screw with them I hadn’t thought of. Cutting off power, cutting off water, taking their stuff and not paying, ignoring their intellectual property, cutting off Alaska…

          Nobody is talking appeasement anymore, even Danielle Smith is getting muted about it. The question is how to help Trump ruin himself the best, politically and economically.

      • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        11 hours ago

        It’s a very complex subject that is difficult to solve

        In a sane world, I agree with you. But we’re dealing with a man who himself doesn’t realise its complexity and only understands strategies that are “blunt and absurd”.

        We can use as nuanced and soft-toed strategies all we want and he’ll never get it through his orange head.

        • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Yes, we’re dealing with a madman. You’re suggesting we act just like him. No, harming more people voluntarily is not the answer.

          • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            9 hours ago

            (not canadian, or american; take that as you will)

            not acting like him: acting in retaliation with measures that hurt the US more than canada… things like IP and copyright protections, digital services, etc

            his blanket measures don’t take into account trade that’s largely beneficial to US companies - they’re stupid blunt instrument crap because thought is too hard… trump hurt himself in his confusion

            retaliating in precise ways can extract value from the US without harming the canadian economy nearly as much

            • MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 hours ago

              As I saw someone link yesterday, John Bolton (noted warmongering piece of shit) said he was in the room during Trump round one when people were trying to explain tariffs to him. Bolton says he was unable to comprehend.

              • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 hours ago

                absolutely… and in those hands they can still be a damaging weapon, but they’ll never be as powerful as someone who knows how to wield them correctly. brains can win, or at least provide a formidable fight… but no matter what, both sides will feel pain

      • horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        It’s not Mutually Assured Destruction though. It’s not even retaliatory. If Canada were to immediately stop all exports to the US and pivot to an EU/China based economy the fallout would disproportionately affect the US. The key to this is that Canada is the smaller and more insular trading partner.

        Case in point

        https://www.reuters.com/markets/commodities/canadian-brewer-buys-local-grain-chinese-cans-due-us-tariffs-2025-03-05/

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        The destruction is mutual, but not assured and total (total just didn’t make it into the acronym). Nuclear war isn’t a good analogy.

        Basically, do we want to continue relying on the US, or not? Not doing so has a cost, but we might not have a choice. Canada can survive without the US, if in a slightly poorer form.

        • MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I worry that Canada will not be able to export efficiently due to lack of port infrastructure, especially on the Pacific Coast. Massive industrial ports are expensive and take years to bring online.

          • djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Y’know, if you’re willing to make a few small concessions on who is ultimately in control of your country, I know this great authoritarian dictatorship that’s been investing in new port infrastructure projects all around the world.

          • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Yes, me too. It’s really hard to find information on how much extra capacity there is, although I’ve seen indications it’s not zero.