ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to Work Reform@lemmy.world · 2 days agoCathy, do the math.slrpnk.netimagemessage-square288fedilinkarrow-up11.92Karrow-down111cross-posted to: antiwork@lemmy.ml
arrow-up11.91Karrow-down1imageCathy, do the math.slrpnk.netByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to Work Reform@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square288fedilinkcross-posted to: antiwork@lemmy.ml
minus-squareOBJECTION!@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-213 hours agoWho’s “we” then, if not non-union members?
minus-squareSheldan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-28 hours agoThe people the contract is with, maybe all employees of the company have the agreement. You are thinking way too much into that statement, the way I described is the way it works here, and that seems much more likely tbh.
minus-squareOBJECTION!@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·5 hours ago The people the contract is with, maybe all employees of the company have the agreement. That’s literally what I’m saying.
minus-squareSheldan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·47 minutes agoYou are saying it’s union members vs non union members being separated. And it’s not.
minus-squareOBJECTION!@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·14 minutes agoThe union members are included in the “we” that contractually makes $0.50/hr more than… union members?
Who’s “we” then, if not non-union members?
The people the contract is with, maybe all employees of the company have the agreement.
You are thinking way too much into that statement, the way I described is the way it works here, and that seems much more likely tbh.
That’s literally what I’m saying.
You are saying it’s union members vs non union members being separated.
And it’s not.
The union members are included in the “we” that contractually makes $0.50/hr more than… union members?