cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 个月前Angry, disappointed users react to Bluesky's upcoming blue check mark verification systemwww.neowin.netexternal-linkmessage-square195linkfedilinkarrow-up1764arrow-down135
arrow-up1729arrow-down1external-linkAngry, disappointed users react to Bluesky's upcoming blue check mark verification systemwww.neowin.netcyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 个月前message-square195linkfedilink
minus-squarePirata@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 个月前Interesting how other instances of the fediverse have no such restrictions. It’s almost as if they want to make it as difficult as possible so that people just don’t federate.
minus-squareNatanael@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 个月前There’s literally no restrictions other than simple rate limiting, which you can ask for exceptions for. I don’t know a Mastodon/lemmy server which wouldn’t rate limit new peers
Interesting how other instances of the fediverse have no such restrictions. It’s almost as if they want to make it as difficult as possible so that people just don’t federate.
There’s literally no restrictions other than simple rate limiting, which you can ask for exceptions for.
I don’t know a Mastodon/lemmy server which wouldn’t rate limit new peers