MyBrainHurts@lemmy.ca to Canada@lemmy.caEnglish · 19 hours agoLove to see itlemmy.caimagemessage-square209fedilinkarrow-up1608arrow-down17
arrow-up1601arrow-down1imageLove to see itlemmy.caMyBrainHurts@lemmy.ca to Canada@lemmy.caEnglish · 19 hours agomessage-square209fedilink
minus-squareSpaceCowboy@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 hours agoRanked choice doesn’t make sense in a proportional representation system.
minus-squaresik0fewl@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 hours agoIt does if you still want to have a local representative, although everything seems to be party politics these days. I’d be happy enough with proportional representation, though.
minus-squareJoseph Szymborski :qcca:@cosocial.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 hours ago@SpaceCowboy @sik0fewl Proportional RCV does indeed exist https://fairvote.org/our-reforms/proportional-ranked-choice-voting/
minus-squarethefool@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·47 minutes agoWhat’s the difference between that and STV?
Ranked choice doesn’t make sense in a proportional representation system.
It does if you still want to have a local representative, although everything seems to be party politics these days.
I’d be happy enough with proportional representation, though.
@SpaceCowboy @sik0fewl Proportional RCV does indeed exist https://fairvote.org/our-reforms/proportional-ranked-choice-voting/
What’s the difference between that and STV?