cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/30061235

As part of this expansion, Qt Group will introduce new bridging technology that integrates Qt with any programming language of choice, initially including Rust, Python, .NET, Swift, and Kotlin/Java.

I’d really like to use Qt for GUI and HMI development for certified medical devices using embedded hardware, but wasn’t looking forward to all the conventional C++ that would have entailed. Looks using Rust with Qt may get better soon?

Second source reporting from Qt World Summit in Munich:

Part of the thinking here is that C++ is regarded as an unsafe language whereas the languages supported by Qt Bridges are safe languages, potentially escaping the notion that because Qt is C++, it is not as safe to use.

  • ruffsl@programming.devOPEnglish
    1·
    13 days ago

    Yeah, any details published so far have been rather vague. I like the prospect of writing my backend UI logic in a memory safe language, but that falls short of benefiting from doing so end to end.

    Supposedly Qt would be in a decent position to use their own static analysis and testing frameworks for hardening such bridge interfaces, but using a memory safe system programming language for everything would be ideal. Are there any Rust based UI projects that are looking at ISO certification to ease integration as a Software of Unknown Pedigree?