That’s one of the most puzzling things about this case, why the defence didn’t put up a fight. They had a medical expert ready to dispute the the prosecution’s assertions but never called them… The stats were being questioned externally as soon as the trial started, but they never touched on that. It’s really bizarre.
I think the theory is it’s because the experts would have had to agree with prosecution points as well. So yes they might disagree with children A-C, F and L but they agree with the others.
That’s one of the most puzzling things about this case, why the defence didn’t put up a fight. They had a medical expert ready to dispute the the prosecution’s assertions but never called them… The stats were being questioned externally as soon as the trial started, but they never touched on that. It’s really bizarre.
I think the theory is it’s because the experts would have had to agree with prosecution points as well. So yes they might disagree with children A-C, F and L but they agree with the others.