Looking at the two big news publishers in my country. One isn’t reporting about the current bombings at all, while the other one is phrasing their words mostly anti-Palestinian.

Is there some neutral coverage I can keep up to? Where do you guys get your info from?

  • redballooon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Ugh. That link is horrible. I mean the descriptions behind it.

    It looks like non-Hamas Palestinians have two enemies working against them.

    Makes me wonder what exactly a Pro-Palestinian position is.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      A pro-Palestinian position is (for now) anti-Hamas and pro-Abbas, supports the removal from Hamas from power, supports Israeli action against Hamas, but decries the limitations of aid or the blockades from Egypt/Jordan/etc against even short-term refugees.

      Palestine would currently be a country, for the first time in human history, if Hamas did not exist.

      • redballooon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Palestine would currently be a country, for the first time in human history, if Hamas did not exist.

        Can you expand on this?

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          A 2 state solution was offered multiple times and was denied because Palestinian leadership had a hard line of Israel not existing.

          When a 2 state solution became politically viable in Palestinian territory, Hamas seized power and refused further elections

          Just because I don’t know if you want clarity on the whole thing, Palestine as never been a country. It was part of Jordan and Egypt before being lost in the 6 Day War, and part of a chain of empires before that. There was no unified Palestinian identity prior to 1967.

          • redballooon@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            To my knowledge the closest state to the 2 state solution was an offer to Arafat after the Camp David negotiations. He didn’t take the offer, but I don’t know why. But that was in 2000, before Hamas seized power in 2005. That was why I asked.

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Abbas moving toward the 2 state solution was what led to the Hamas takeover, and violent skirmishes between the PA and Hamas. Specifically their issues were the more secular state the PA favors and that they don’t believe Israel should exist

              • redballooon@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                So the ideal solution would be a 2-state+1-cage solution, where the cage is for Hamas and Netanyahu together with his Ultra Orthodox faction, where they can fight each other to death, while Israel and Palestine negotiate on a peace treaty.