By June 2025, Minnesota House Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband Mark were murdered by Vance Boelter, a registered Republican and Trump loyalist. Boelter then tried to kill Senator John Hoffman, leaving him and his wife seriously wounded.
And most recently, right-wing influencer Charlie Kirk was shot by Tyler Robinson, a young man from a staunch Republican Mormon family. Robinson has no formal party ties but has reportedly adopted the ideology of far-right extremist Nick Fuentes.
So how many attackers from this list are associated with the Democratic Party, progressives, or mainstream leftist groups? The answer: none. The only individual who could be described as Left-leaning is Quintez Brown.
It’s too soon to say Robinson supported the right. His family did but he did not seem to share those ideas anymore. And someone shall not be judged on his family‘s belief. Frankly judging too fast is not helping the debate.
The stats are anyway already hard to deny. So adding Robinson and his unclear leanings to the balance actually weakens your argument.
Cute, but when the POTUS immediately calls the assassination an action by “the radical left”, there’s not much room to have an earnest argument.
No, let’s first research this for a year and then explain how this was wrong. People will understand that.
I saw a great article examining his possible motives on NPR. They pointed out the likihood that, as much as everyone is trying to point fingers, his was probably not a political killing in the way we’re imagining it.
The whole thing is worth a read, but I found the closing bit rather chilling:
I don’t see that as chilling, more like reassuring.
Fewer school shootings would be a blessing but I don’t know if the political chaos from high profile murders would be much better. *Might just end up with more of both too.
I doubt an increase in political shootings would mean a decrease in school shootings. I suspect the shooters involved are from two very different circles.
Whether he “supported the right” at the moment he killed Kirk is really besides the point.
He was raised, in a deep red area in a deep red state, in a right-wing, MAGA environment his whole life. That’s all he knew from the time he was born. He came from a pro gun / hunter family, deeply entrenched in that culture from what he said in his texts and how he felt responsible for his grandfather’s bolt action rifle.
He was stewed in it, forged by it his whole life and those are the values and morality that formed him.
That’s like saying everyone in Utah is a Mormon, or everyone raised in the church is a Christian. Strict ideological upbringings often backfire.
Ok? A lifetime of indoctrination and propaganda in a MAGA family and community certainly did “backfire”. If by backfire you meant growing up in that environment was supposed to create some kind and gentle altar boy.