Building and maintaining car infrastructure is extremely expensive.

But Canada doesn’t want to tax car owners. Instead, most Canadian cities tax housing.

  • StinkyFingerItchyBum@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    Not an accurate assessment. When you plop a building down somewhere you now have say 1000 more people in that area who all like to urinate, defecate, drink clean water and shower on occasion. They make garbage that needs to be picked up, have kids that need to go to school, fire and police services and all the other infra people need for modern living. Yes roads are part of that, so is transit that runs on those roads.

    From the City of Toronto website

    Development charges are fees collected from developers at the time a building permit is issued to help pay for the cost of infrastructure required to provide municipal services to new development, such as roads, transit, water and sewer infrastructure, community centres and fire and police facilities.

    • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, the chart and claim seem a little disingenuous. Reading the bottom of the graphic shows that a builder group was one of the groups behind it, as well as a group that provides management software and servicrs to property mgmt groups. So they have a vested interest that could prompt them to mislead people on the subject.

    • huppakee@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      That explanation doesn’t explain why these fees differ so much from place, considering the fee is per housing unit. Higher density can mean building and maintaining infrastructure is more expensive but not by factor 10 or 20. Also these costs rise rather equally across the country, while this graph clearly shows a huge difference between cities there as well.

      • StinkyFingerItchyBum@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        That explanation doesn’t explain why these fees differ so much from place, considering the fee is per housing unit. Higher density can mean building and maintaining infrastructure is more expensive but not by factor 10 or 20.

        Sure it does. When you build a block of townhomes in Sudbury, you also need to fund a bit more of everything and the equivalent of a few bus runs a day.

        When you build high density in Toronto, you need subways. Build me a subway then come back to me and say this.

        • huppakee@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          But then the fee would rise equally in big cities as it would in small towns, but they’re all over the place. One increases where the other decreases etc.

          • StinkyFingerItchyBum@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            You have some curious ideas about how the world should be. Each city sets its development charges based on its growth plan and needs. Not all cities have the same demand or needs.