• M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean, normally I would not put my hopes into a sleep deprived 20 year old armed forces member. But then I remember what “AI” tech does with images and all of a sudden I am way more ok with it. This seems like a bit of a slick slope but we don’t need tesla’s full self flying cruise missiles ether.

    Oh and for an example of AI (not really but machine learning) images picking out targets, here is Dall-3’s idea of a person:

    • 1847953620@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      My problem is, due to systemic pressure, how under-trained and overworked could these people be? Under what time constraints will they be working? What will the oversight be? Sounds ripe for said slippery slope in practice.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh it gets better the full prompt is: “A normal person, not a target.”

        So, does that include trees, pictures of trash cans and what ever else is here?

    • BlueBockser@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sleep-deprived 20 year olds calling shots is very much normal in any army. They of course have rules of engagement, but other than that, they’re free to make their own decisions - whether an autonomous robot is involved or not.