• GBR24_B_S@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I worked for a medical clinic years ago.

    One doctor was pushing natural hormone therapy.

    I asked one of the other doctors. He wouldn’t touch it.

    He told me he sees thousands of patients each year. Some number will get cancer, and some number of them will sue him.

    If he prescribes a medication, he can defend himself by pointing to the medical studies showing the safety of the medication.

    If he prescribes anything natural, there are no studies showing safety, because nobody can patent natural substances. Therefore there isn’t much money to be made, so nobody spends the money to do good studies.

    Even if it was a miracle drug, he wouldn’t prescribe it.

    • blujan@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      He is wrong tho, natural substances can and are regularly patented when a use is found for them or a production method that’s better is discovered.

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Monsanto has entered the chat.

        DNA shouldn’t be patentable. I guarantee you that the scenario that Micheal Crichton laid out in Next will end up happening at some point unless we reign this shit in.