- cross-posted to:
- fediverse@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- fediverse@lemmy.world
Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
Mass instance bans
Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
Done
Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.
He has abused the modlog to claim ‘harassment’, which I have never engaged in. I have not even interacted with Rimu in any way for days prior to getting kicked from the PieFed developer Matrix channels.
He has decided to mass ban 20 users because they have spoken out against his erratic and hostile behaviour as of late.
Lol multiple people can see with their own 2 eyes that Mia said she thinks Rimu is a transphobe?
Must be an alt!
Except she didn’t, she took the instances ideals as the reason the instance was shadowbanned as Rimu provided no actual reason.
Do you need me to quote it for you? She said she assumes the reason is that Rimu is anti-left and transphobic.
Because you’re a lying piece of shit, I’ll quote it for you
Does that say Rimu is transphobic or that quokka.au is pro-trans? Go on tell me champ.
Quote where she said that.
Because as my quote clearly shows, she said quokk.au is pro-trans.
Show the words “Rimu is transphobic”
If someone silences you because of your pro-trans views, any reasonable person would recognize that as being “anti-pro-trans”, or more simply “anti-trans”. Another way to say that is “transphobic”.
You disagree with that?
I disagree with your biased interpretation.
Rimu has not made his reasoning known, as such we can only assume it’s ideological and therefore listing the ideological stance of the instance he shadowbanned matters.
Rimu is more than welcome to come and talk to explain why he did what he did, instead he has only tripled down on ignoring people.
That’s a huuuuuge dodge.
Which part of my interpretation do you disagree with:
Ehh, not super-explicitly, sure.
No, you choose to assume it’s ideological. But it’s telling that it’s the first thing the FAF crew always leaps to.
This is like the 5th time someone has said that and no have not seen any evidence.
Yes describing what the instance is. Where’s the claim?
If someone silences you because of your pro-trans views, any reasonable person would recognize that as being “anti-pro-trans”, or more simply “anti-trans”. Another way to say that is “transphobic”.
You disagree with that?
I go by actions rather than what words are used as so many prefer optics rather than what is actually happening.
It’s extremely telling when those saying rimu was called transphobic only bring it up as a way to deflect from rimus actions.
It’s really easy to come to a specific conclusion if you go searching for it like in this case.
Nice dodge.
I’ll ask again:
If someone silences you because of your pro-trans views, any reasonable person would recognize that as being “anti-pro-trans”, or more simply “anti-trans”. Another way to say that is “transphobic”.
You disagree with that?
How is that a dodge?
If someone takes actions to silence trans people or attack them yes but that’s not at all what rimu supports keep shouting as the claim.
So this is what actually happened or it was just a statement on the instance that had repercussions done to it by rimu?
Please help me and others understand
Because it’s completely non-responsive to my question.
Okay! So you agree.
It is what Mia actually said she thinks is a reason the instance was silenced, yes. Therefore, my original claim is true.
If only you were willing.