I asked Google Bard whether it thought Web Environment Integrity was a good or bad idea. Surprisingly, not only did it respond that it was a bad idea, it even went on to urge Google to drop the proposal.

  • DarkThoughts@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    AI feed from various types of information, in this case public information. Public information about WEI consist of a bunch of tech articles criticizing it. Thus, the AI tells you WEI is bad. It’s as worthless as the majority of AI based replies about certain topics because it will just summarize popular opinions, as that is the majority of its dataset on a given topic.

    • quaddo@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It might depends on the AI.

      I can’t speak for Bard, but ChatGPT’s data isn’t any more recent than 2021. As it often reminds me.

    • d3Xt3r@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I know. I just thought it was a bit ironic seeing such a strongly worded response from it.

  • WhyYesZoidberg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Third, WEI could be used to collect user data.”

    ding ding ding

    Don’t forget that google is an ad-company.

  • CyprianSceptre@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean the idea for WEI is to combat bots and AI so it isn’t really surprising AI is going to be against it.

    But seriously, Bard is just consolidating what it finds on the internet (it’s not intelligent), so all this really says is that there are plenty of web articles against AI in its search database.

  • ryannathans@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    What’s with all these shitty archive sites, they are so unreliable I’d almost prefer a paywall

  • lutillian@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Google has a proven track record of being very insecure. Obviously if they implement this standard we should just implement the API on all of our sites to have it only block people using chrome, chromeos or a pixel device and purple who directed to or sites via a Google search.