• WFH@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    30 days ago

    Phrasing sucks. I think it means “consumers refuse to buy second-hand EVs because they fear that batteries would lose a shitton of capacity. Turns out, they’re fine. The batteries, we mean.”

    Which is both good news (yay for good capacity on second-hand cars) and bad news (because EVs depreciate super fast and I’m counting on it to afford one, and may not depreciate as much anymore).

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      The bigger killer of lithium EV batteries is age. Not miles they’ve gone. LifePO4 last longest aft what’s commonly available, but the EV cells will go bad after 12 to 20 years no matter if the cars gone 10,000 miles or 300,000 miles. The batteries chemistry simply isn’t stable for long term beyond that.

      • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        27 days ago

        yeah there’s never anything good enough to replace good ol fossil fuels huh?

        this guy is a shill for exxon. every argument is bad faith, poorly reasoned or outright lies.

        • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          27 days ago

          Oh please. Look at my first post, dumbass. I just said not to buy an older used EV, and if you do, get one with LifePO4 batteries. You’re just pissed because you don’t know anything and you’re in here trying to argue something you know nothing about.