sanitation@lemmy.todayBanned from community to Work Reform@lemmy.world · 1 month agoThis is why Americans hate Socialism.lemmy.todayimagemessage-square158linkfedilinkarrow-up1988arrow-down125
arrow-up1963arrow-down1imageThis is why Americans hate Socialism.lemmy.todaysanitation@lemmy.todayBanned from community to Work Reform@lemmy.world · 1 month agomessage-square158linkfedilink
minus-squaremerc@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·1 month agoBut it does mean nobody to enforce the rules, which means no rules.
minus-squareathatet@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 month agoOh wow. How very convincing. I guess you got me.
minus-squaremerc@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down3·1 month agoMy argument was just as high quality as yours.
minus-squareCommunist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoNo it doesn’t, name one anarchist society where this was an issue in the real world. https://anarwiki.org/wiki/List_of_Anarchist_Societies point to them here
minus-squaremerc@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoAnd the largest one in that list is…? And the longest lasting is…? Just because you can balance a knife on its tip doesn’t mean that that’s a stable configuration, and if anarchism is not stable, why bother talking about it?
minus-squareCommunist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 month agoThat’s a different point, we can move onto that one next if you’d like, first i’d like you to concede your previous one. simply admit what you said has never happened in the real world, and anarchism doesn’t mean no rules, it means no rulers. Unless you have an example where that happened on the list, where that was the reason for the collapse.
minus-squaremerc@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·1 month agoPerhaps you should do more than just read a book and look at the real world?
“No rulers” doesn’t mean “no rules.”
But it does mean nobody to enforce the rules, which means no rules.
No it doesn’t.
Yes it does.
Oh wow. How very convincing. I guess you got me.
My argument was just as high quality as yours.
No it doesn’t, name one anarchist society where this was an issue in the real world.
https://anarwiki.org/wiki/List_of_Anarchist_Societies
point to them here
And the largest one in that list is…? And the longest lasting is…? Just because you can balance a knife on its tip doesn’t mean that that’s a stable configuration, and if anarchism is not stable, why bother talking about it?
That’s a different point, we can move onto that one next if you’d like, first i’d like you to concede your previous one.
simply admit what you said has never happened in the real world, and anarchism doesn’t mean no rules, it means no rulers.
Unless you have an example where that happened on the list, where that was the reason for the collapse.
Lol read a book, my god
Perhaps you should do more than just read a book and look at the real world?