Data: about 6,900 opinions from YouTube reviews and 3,600 from Reddit owners, on 654 products, collected for BettaScore (a ranking site)

  • blubasaur@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Well yeah, users actually have a product for hopefully years while reviewers just check it out for a week or 2.

  • terraborra@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I’d assume the difference is probably down to owners using the products for an extended period of time compared to reviewers.

    • LateNightDebugging@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      That’s my guess too. Most reviewers had a product for only one or two weeks, and lots of owner complaints show up a month later.

    • brewery@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Was thinking the same. Most reviewers get sent a bunch of things to test so spend a short amount of time. Plus there is no incentive to judge longevity as long as people buy it, and they get commission

      • LateNightDebugging@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Probably a bit of both. Even an honest reviewer can’t report a failure that happens in month 8. That is why we weight owner reports pretty havily.

  • plud_klem@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    It’s interesting to think that reddit is by its very nature a more negative platform. I’d say that holds outside of just product reviews tho. I feel so bad for people trying to learn a challenging hobby on reddit. I often tell new people to bolt for the fediverse before wasting time with your new hobby’s smartest misanthropes.