deleted by creator
It’s either the total destruction of all the worlds forests, OR I take a huge financial hit with my unimaginably terrible investment into leaves as currency.
As you can see, by this logic it is … um … better for the economy … that we destroy all the world’s forests.
“Sir, we must burn down the world’s forests and destroy everyone’s economic assets.”
“Are you sure that this is the way to go about solving inflation?”
“Inflation?”
This post is gold.
deleted by creator
But hear me out… What if…
… You just made a pic of them, slap 'em in a wallet and call it an nft.
Instantly worth 1000 bucks because I say so.
First impression: WTF are autism leaves?
They told me I would never make any money as a jazz musician.
The economist is lying
Imagine brushing all these gold leaves onto a pile, then with a shovel disposing of those leaves.
I mean, if gold is massively devalued. Don’t think it’d ever be worth less than leaves, but given its actual useful properties (as opposed to its arbitrary use as a currency) gold’s value should be a lot lower than it is.
I mean I make compost, so dead leaves are a commodity I’m highly looking for to aquire.
Well there was a maple syrup heist where $18 million worth of syrup was stolen.
deleted by creator
If you want an actual answer, it’s not the leaves that go in but the sap inside the tree, and it’s a 40 to 1 ratio of sap to syrup.
A bottle will need about 30 litres (8 gallons) of sap.
deleted by creator
“Change the currency to oak leaves Greenspan!”
(extremely dated reference)