I finally got the dreaded over storage warning from google today. What is everyone moving to these days? People were moving to dropbox advance but i heard its not really unlimited anymore. I have 30TB of data that can’t be reproduced (family videos and photos). Any recommendations? I prefer not to spend $100+ a month on backups but if i have to do it then i’ll do it.

  • Catsrules@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think the days of unlimited backups are coming to a close. I don’t know of any truly unlimited storage anymore.

    At that size do you have and friends or family you could just use as an off site backup? It would be a high upfront cost for buying the drives and hardware but should be much cheaper overall. If that is something your looking for.

    Or even a safety deposit box for an offline/offsite backup.

    • Deniable1477@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I currently have a NAS at home and another one at my parent’s house a few towns over. I don’t know anyone out of state that’s willing to host a NAS for me. I prefer to have my data in the cloud since me and my parents don’t live that far from me and the data is irreplaceable.

      • Catsrules@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Ahh that makes sense. In that case I think AWS Glacier might be your cheapest option. (At least until you need to restore).

        Edit. That said a safety deposit box might still be an option if you vacation or visit a far away place somewhat regularly. Just update it every year or so. Keep changes waiting to be updated in a cloud backup. This way your not backing up and paying for 30 TB in the cloud but maybe 1-3TB of recent data that hasn’t been backup to the safety deposit box. That cloud backup size would get reset once you successfully update the safety deposit backups.

        I am not sure what the best option is software wise for actually accomplishing this world be. But something to think about.

  • liori@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s Jottacloud with unlimited storage for 10 EUR/month, but they gradually slow down after first 5 TB. 30 TB might be a bit too much. There’s Hetzner with their dedicated 4×10TB machines for ~52 EUR, you could do RAID5 and have somewhat redundant 30 TB, at the cost of self-managing a dedicated machine. There are several providers doing regular S3 (which you can take advantage of with tools like rclone) with decent redundancy for 4-5 USD/TB + egress. For high-value data you should be probably spending more than 100 USD/month for 30TB in the cloud, or invest in actual hardware. Do you need hot access to this dataset, or is a cold storage archive enough?

    • Deniable1477@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Cold storage is enough. Most of the data are pictures and videos that i don’t access regularly. I was looking at Hetzner but it looks like most of the servers are in the EU. I’m based out of the US so i’m guessing file transfer would be slow. I also don’t have experience with Hetzner but if they are reputable then i don’t have an issue with going down that route.

      • liori@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yep, it’s EU. File transfer shouldn’t be bad if your files are large, though it’s best if you tested it first—it might depend on your ISP’s peering and your prefered transfer protocols/tooling. Whether it’s reputable for your purpose, you probably have to do your own research. Also, remember that the offer I mentioned would only be equivalent in durability to a single-box RAID5 for your purposes, so not exactly equivalent to Google’s.

    • CanOpener@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      AWS Glacier will be cheaper until you need to restore the data. On AWS, you’ll pay $0.09/GB for bandwidth + Glacier retrieval fees. Over time, AWS might be cheaper but you’ll be looking at a $3000+ bill to restore 30 TB.

  • BoofStroke@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Local NAS with one share for Borg and proxmox image backups. That is then sync’d to S3 glacier. Borg is used for compressed, deduped archives of all important data. I do 3 daily, 4 weekly, 3 monthly.

    Borg to rsync.net works too. Or just use rsync.net directly and they will snapshot for you. Borg accounts are cheaper though.

  • ChojinDSL@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    What you also might consider is re-encoding your stuff to use less space. Photos can be stored as lower quality jpgs and home movies can be reencoded as hevc. The latter can even be done automatically using something like tdarr.