https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/darn#Etymology_2

the government telling you that we are indeed fighting isis forces and not for oil

No/Yes/Yes

Why not?

However, the hacker(s) indicated, that should Schneider publicly admit to this latest data breach, the ransom would be cut in half. Thus, the ransom demanded would decrease to $62,500 worth of baguettes, we would presume. Even with a 50% deduction, that’s still a lot of dough.

firstly I was joking
secondly, cautious ≠ squeamish. we shouldn’t be setting masculinity as an example

energy is converted and never destroyed so it’s true

WILL NOT TOLERATE THIS TOM SCOTT SLANDER

A statement from the executive director of Mothers’ Milk Bank of North Texas, Shaina Stanks, said her institution was left “astounded and inspired” by how Ogletree had delivered “an incomprehensible amount of surplus breastmilk to fragile infants”.

“Her life-saving efforts are an undeniable testament to her extraordinary generosity and compassion,” Stanks’ statement added.

If your concern was that I didn’t qualify the headline’s area of interest, I just did that. The headline was from the TechCrunch article this link post goes to.

Could you clarify what you mean by my description not matching the study nor title?

YSK that journals screen for conflict of interest, and none were found or declared here.

dbzer0 is only as thematic as ml is imo

The very second website in the file they use to track recently-moved websites uses substack (now).

Meanwhile, Automattic’s response to WP Engine’s lawsuit claimed the company “failed to plausibly allege specific financial harm.”

The footer says the site is operated by Automattic.

There were only “two parties in all States,” Randolph concluded. “The ins and the outs.” The ins construed governmental power broadly for the gain of their own “patronage and wealth,” while the outs tried to limit such power. “But let the outs get in . . . and you will find their Constitutional scruples and arguments vanish like dew before the morning sun.”

At least certain courts may interpret “official duty” differently…

Yes. Constitutionally, the threat of impeachment is supposed to prevent that.

I’m not saying the system works or rises to the level of good. I’m saying that it is much better than the Russian system. The people at least get to choose who they think they want, and which group of people will be whipped more.

where funny