To be fair, only a handful of publishers were able to take their cards and go elsewhere. The media companies were a lot more on top of dragging their products off of Netflix.
Nobody would be on steam just for Valve games, after all, and indie has a much lower barrier of entry.
While they could certainly distribute their current products better, a lot of the issues they have now (see: belated frogs comment) aren’t things they really had control over.
It’s probably because I generally saw the sub shutdowns as a result of the protest, and not as an ongoing protest. Reddit clearly wasn’t in any talks with the mods at that point and vica versa.
Honestly i’ll just go with it being months. I’m basically just arguing semantics at this point.
I mean, I remember it being weeks myself.
But it’s not as if things went back to the way they were either. There were definitely effects due to those weeks.
It wasn’t the right argument is the issue. Like only the last thing he ever said was directly saying CPC.
Like if thats what we wanted to find out we clearly got the wrong person to ask it.
I mean, we do have the phrase “Take justice into your own hands”
You can do wrong by someone that receives retribution, without a law being present for it.
Laws just make that much, much, much less murky.
Didn’t the animal tests lead to pretty bad deaths? And wasn’t that less than a year ago? I can’t imagine this going well.
Plus there was the blind-tech that was revealed not too long ago where now that they’re bankrupt the group is slowly going blind and worse. I feel like none of this is going to end well.
So really you’re only playing moderator because you’re for it, and don’t want people to vote against it.
I mean, “obviously causing damage to our health”
The issue with that is the question “And do what?”
Like what matters is that you do something that is actually healthy for your body. Internet is if anything probably a step up from the age of couch surfing on the TV, since you at least need to actively navigate it. Mostly meaning to say that you could easily just choose something that isn’t any better.
But either way you’d be better off just choosing something healthy to do, like exercise.
I still use redirects to visit Reddit (I don’t bother if they don’t work), mainly because one of the main communities I track didn’t really move here.
Does Youtube count? That’s pretty much the only other thing I could think of.
I’m not
I can’t even try using an alternative redirect because apparently all of them are blocked.
Was strict the default? I’d assume the standard would be the default.
I’d imagine if you were using strict you want the sites to break because you absolutely do not want fingerprinting. That kindof restriction usually comes with the breaking being expected.
Uhhh…that’s not a meme, as the other guy said it’s virtue signalling. I don’t even know why you would fallback on it being a meme since people generally agreed with what you said.
If anything I think that makes you sound like an ass but that’s just me.
I mean yeah, but Spez we know for a fact actually did something.
Pretty sure you have to do random things without actual intent.
Like if you were an actual Eagle owner and actually lost your eagle. All the time.
Meanwhile someone will be eating gummies to cure themselves of some modern disease instead of using actual science-proven medication.
Okay
But in this entire discussion we haven’t even tied him or his homophobia to the feature change this article is discussing.
I mean, it’s more like I wanted to see more discussion about brave. It’s not even like it’s talking about things the CEO specifically did to the browser, it’s just talking about the CEO.
And yeah I’m complaining about different threads in a post, when 3 comments are about the browser and like 15 are about the CEO.
If you have something to say negative about brave from this feature, that’s cool, but I’m not seeing it.
I’m…honestly surprised you can be on lemmy when you damn products over singular people. Just cause I know there’s people who have tried to dissuade others from lemmy over the developers. And in that case the people involved are even closer to the code than a CEO would be.
I mean it’s derailed the entire thread so pretty much nobody is talking about the removed feature anymore.
I don’t want bat credit card and ice puns either. It’s good for a laugh, but only because of how bad it is.
Just make Batman serious without making him unnecessarily edgy. We don’t need to psychoanalyze every little thing interesting about him until it’s not interesting anymore, especially not in the first movie. Leave the viewers to fill in some blanks.
The Arkham games were a great example that you can have a serious batman and still have a silly but dangerous Joker. And all they did was ramp up the actually good cartoon series that is still better than the movies.