CTDummy

The sentiment in this thread and the votes on the OP are why this is happening I suspect. Windows knows their consumer sentiment is so low it’s below the dumps. Honestly Im here for it, it’s nowhere near enough but focusing on UX for fucking once is a step in the right direction. Whether they don’t full M$$ it and shit the bed, yet again, remains to be seen.

The third party tool activates Microsoft’s new start menu since they’re doing incremental rollouts.

The more you know, it makes sense, I definitely will use this information for non fire starting activities.

During his arson spree, Orr had several nicknames: the Pillow pyro due to the location of the fires inside retail stores; Frito Bandito, due to starting some of his fires using potato chips.

What.

Fire investigators from Southern California converged on the destroyed store, and declared the cause to be an electrical fire. However, Orr insisted that the cause was arson. Orr was correct, of course, because he had set the blaze.

Wild you’d be this blatant after a fire that kills 4 people but I guess you get complacent after getting away with something 2000 times.

Lmao already people making their agents try this on the site. Of course what could have been a somewhat interesting experiment devolves into idiots getting their bots to shill ads/prompt injections for their shitty startups almost immediately.

I don’t disagree but I’m just presenting why every other retailer has them. As another commenter said though, I too am not a “small talk” type of person and hate that these stores train staff to try and engage in small talk with customers. I wasn’t checkout but was trained so I could help with overflow. I always only ever greeted people, with maybe one other follow up remark and then just got them out of there. Since I knew as a customer, I just wanted my shit scanned and to go home. For me it was more customers who seemed to want to have a yarn.

It’s purely to save on wages and related expenses. At my local the self checkouts have one person watching to help when the self checkouts call them (weight/item mismatch, receipt paper low, etc). The amount of people these self checkouts process would require 2-3 tills minimum for standard foot traffic + approx at least 2 for peak times. This requires those 2-3 being paid for a full shift plus two other, checkout trained staff nearby to be available to open lanes for overflow. All handled by a total of 2-3 checkout staff instead of 4-6.

So less wages, less money lost on training checkout capable staff, less management having to maintain a roster of sufficient staff, with sufficient hours to keep them around. Checkout staff generally wouldn’t do many other tasks back in the day beyond click and collect either and had a lot of idle time, because obviously you can’t be far from a till.

You’re absolutely right, I shouldn’t have driven in the oncoming lane — before cutting a corner, mounting the curb and mowing down an elderly, human shaped obstacle. I’ll keep this in mind for future trips. Your feedback has been both comprehensive and insightful; and is indicative of someone with a strong analytical mind! 🧠

More concerningly is this going to trial in the US’ current governmental “degraded” (to put it lightly) condition. NFPs get a bunch of concessions and benefits to being such. It’s not unheard of for NFPs to have for profits subsidiaries but I feel like letting them bootstrap into FP, often on the taxpayers/states dime should be, legally speaking, a no no.

Nah it’s just your claim of them of addressing none of the OPs concerns and being a blind shill is objectively wrong and you’e in your feelings about that being pointed out to you.

Fuck that is depressing. I had hoped I’d be able to pay for a service and not worry about this shit to avoid the hassle of self hosting. Very informative thank you.

Op.

can create a priority inbox without all the pesky notification clutter

User.

(e.g. you can create aliases for your shipping stuff called [website].shipping@[myalias].com and then make a rule including all the adresses .shipping to a specific folder).

I.e avoiding shipping notification clutter by directing to folders. Don’t really disagree with the placing too much trust in one company for whatever it’s worth.

Thanks for the links, the recovery email aspect was covered in the initial comment old mate was replying to. I was more interested in if the hand your ass over remark had anything to do with the “they cant read your emails”/encryption part. The second link is very interesting though:

After providing the activist’s metadata to Swiss authorities, ProtonMail removed the section that had promised no IP logs, replacing it with one saying, “ProtonMail is an email that respects privacy and puts people (not advertisers) first.”

Also, sealioning is “just asking questions” (JAQ’ing off). Consistently interrogating a position or POV for example, with requests for evidence. Not asking someone to provide some sort of evidence for a single claim they made in reply to another user and refusal to find said evidence for them.

Sealioning (also sea-lioning and sea lioning ) is a type of trolling or harassment that consists of pursuing people with relentless requests for evidence, often tangential or previously addressed, while maintaining a pretense of civility and sincerity (“I’m just trying to have a debate”), and feigning ignorance of the subject matter

Emphasis mine. From wiki. I appreciate the attempt to deescalate though and accept it’s probably time to pack it in with that particular user.

How about you google burden of proof? Like the other user said burden of proof is on the party making the claim. It’s not on other people to prove the claim wrong by doing research for you.

Sure I saw yours and accept that, but “hand your ass over” doesn’t equate to “complies minimally with legal request they have to in order to remain functioning as a business” in my book.

Burden of proof is on you.

Are you basing this on anything? I agree with another poster that proton being the go to alternative is somewhat suspect in my paranoid brain but some of these remark here seem pretty outlandish.

They addressed all the OPs requirement excluding remarking on the spam filter. What are you even talking about.