I have basically the same training technique. I have one cat that doesn’t eat all their wet food immediate. When the others have tried to jump in, that no makes them freeze, then lift and remove without pets or other recognition, eventually they stop trying.

Cats aren’t untrainable but they aren’t dogs so it requires different techniques and expectations.

For keeping the dry food away from dogs, I keep their free feeders in the cat trees but that means getting the ones that have a large enough middle platform.

I also feed them at night because they can’t make me going to sleep. They will make mad dashes to the area where they get wet food if they think I’m going to bed.

There is precedence for punching them in the face. If its good enough for someone who was involved in the missions, it seems like a reasonable place to start.

What I’m hearing here is the reason her medication was denied is because people like you are more than willing to jump between a patient and their doctor to take the bullet.

There are many who had all these resources and the only thing that worked was this medication.

You clearly do not have the medical knowledge to back any of this up since your take away from those articles on excersing for depression is that it’s is a replacement for medicine. That’s the pop-science understanding of the topic.

You are leaking Dunning-Krugerall over this thread and you inability to absorb new knowledge here is telling.

It is the advertising of any market differentiator or specifically when it’s for security.

And depressed people can save money by just smiling more!

All those behavior cycles and feedback mechanisms are also literally what these GPL drugs suppress.

It’s like anxiety meds for someone who has diabilitating anxiety to just relax. Or more commonly telling the clinically depressed to just smile more.

Telling someone it’s a personal failing only fuels the feedback mechanism.

Medications exist because they stop the biological feedback loops.

Then it doesn’t happen. Your fear is not my fear.

Would you rather they ended up with zero dollars?

Yes.

The only terms under which I could potential accept tax money being used to save a company from a collapse leading to massive layoffs, is if the resulting company is also made entirely employee owned.

I’ve got a fun fact that’s true but will get you cancelled.

Declawed cats live longer.

People will lose their minds over it.

It’s technically true but only because people who declaw their cats keep them indoors at higher rate than non declawed cat. This rate is high enough to offset the reduction in lifespan that accompanies getting a cat declawed.

So on an individual left it’s not true but when you p-hack you can make a lot of nonsense things sound true.

For example, I bet the co2 thing is an understatement if you select only for dogs of celebrities where the owner takes them in airplanes often. It’s possible the original statement was something along those lines but our human memory loves to drop those critical details.

It does when it confirms my biases!

When you take into account inflation and the overall market gains over that time, they absolutely did not make their money back.

I’ve been using the tagging feature exclusively for these people. I don’t want to block anyone so I give them my Scarlett letter. Then I know to skip past their commentary on any topic that is so much as poltical adjacent.

I did try to engage originally but it’s literally like talking to Trump supporters online, they immediately go for personal attacks and any evidence that goes against their belief system is ignored.

Lemmy is just people who don’t like things.

And it’s all incredibly lower effort distastes. I wonder how much of it is because there is an non-insignificant portion of the user base that came here not by choice but because they’re too toxic for Reddit and got account banned.

Having a vendor explicitly supporting it…epic is an understatement.

Bitcoin. 120k. 2025.

The victims becoming the victimizers is a trope Israel leaned into full throttle.

it’s because every device connected to a cell halves the bandwidth available to each device, and after something like 30-40 devices the cell is full.

I don’t know where you’re getting this from. There not how cells have worked since at least 3g, sort of sounds like how consumer grade WiFi hardware operates.

Towers are designed with sectors that are directional and each can support thousands of devices but those can’t handle 10k people at a stadium.

If you had bothered to read the article youd have read they are talking about how stadiums are now using distributed antenna systems (DAS), which is basically hundreds of antennas spread over the venue and fed directly into fiber. Each one is designed to handle a small section. The carriers do need to hook into the endpoint here so this isn’t something that can be setup on a whim.

I don’t see it mentioned but there are also mobile units, cellular on wheels (COWS) are common one and they really easy to spot if know to look for them. Basically a cell tower on trailer that can use microwave for the back haul for when on site fiber isn’t available.

If you end up at a venue and can’t get service it’s because the venue is too cheap to use any of these existing options. They could also be using some outdated antennas, LTE can’t handle as many connections as the new 5G stuff.

Yes. It’s all bad. The solution is to get rid of these political stooges. Dealing with capitalists is a different topic. There is some cross over with the poltical stoogery but that’s all there is.

Apple is doing this instead of requiring app developers to implement and maintain their own system, which is what Android is doing.

The question comes down to who trust more, any random app developer or a single entity.

For example this means meta doesn’t have to verify their iOS users because iOS already has.

I’m sure most people in this thread are coming at this all from a morally superior position about how they don’t use meta but they also don’t use iOS devices so this is another bit of outrage.

No one here is actually anything besides get upset about something that doesn’t effect them. The internet has become a silly place.

On temporary contracts and at reduced wages of course because times are tough.

Software engineers predicted this would happen. The percentage of developers that love fixing other people’s code is essentially zero, fixing ai code is even smaller.

If they require low wages, they’ll only get the worst of the worst. Expect this phase to repeat until they are forced to hire for competence and pay above market rate required to convince senior developers to deal with not just the ai mess but all the failed attempts to turn it around.