🏳️‍⚧️Edward [it/its]

AuDHD danish baby-commieDoesn’t read. A cat

  • 0 Posts
  • 15 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 18th, 2023

help-circle









  • Presumably the reasons for the initial attack still exist

    Then… they failed? You’re saying that if they win, they fail. Or at least, they can’t win hard enough to actually get what they want.

    You’re also assuming Russia wants territory. If Russia wanted, say, Ukraine not being admitted to NATO, and they can get a peace that ensures that, then there isn’t a reason for them to invade again. Or if Russia wanted UKR to stop shelling the eastern regions, then annexing just them might stop that, in which case, they don’t have any reason to invade again.





  • Russia leaving is apparently never an option when they talk about possible solutions

    Yes… it isn’t. Thats how reality works. Russia isn’t going to just up and leave. They aren’t going to have thousands of their own people killed and then just… nothing. They have goals, they want to meet them, and if not then at least get somewhat of a victory. The people in Russia aren’t going to like “oh, we just left”. I don’t fucking understand how people can say “the war ends when russia [just up and leaves]”. This isn’t fantasy land, that isn’t how it works. Russia will leave, if Ukraine negotiates a peace with them. If Russia wants land then UK has to negotiate for that not to happen.