She had also expressed that she was ok with me seeing the pics I had of her, knowing well that many of those were wildly sexual (she even sent a :( when I said I’d delete them)
She’s the asshole for how she’s dealt with this entire situation. Those are mixed friggen signals. She sounds fucking greasy. Best of luck.
Okay… So based on this new info I’m going with YTA. You know this is his main hobby, you know he’s passionate about it, you guys have talked about it in the past, why make drama? Why spend your time trying to make him feel wrong? If you don’t want to be with the guy as he is, you don’t have to be with him.
And he’s either an asshole or socially dense. If he knows you’re unhappy, and he’s just letting the relationship drag out, fuck that.
I just don’t care 🙌
I seriously couldn’t give two fucks about supporting influencers or tech companies. Uploaders can pay for the infrastructure for all I care. Like people use to host websites out of passion, now everything is about profits, and politics, why would I want to support that? Why should I give two fucks about making someone else rich?
Fuck that shit. You can get cracked copies of the YouTube App that give a much better experience.
There’s different degrees of harm. We all live in society, that means our choices impact other people. The electronics powering the infrastructure we’re using are full of cobalt picked by child hands. You can’t eat almonds without contributing to death.
There’s a significant difference between punching someone in the face vs posting a Facebook article. And in my opinion, trying to exert control over the expression of others is a much more deliberate and direct act.
Sorry, I’m going to try to be less argumentative 😅
Misinformation has a direct cost in lives and money. So it seems to me to be morally good to stop it.
I personally consider things like freedom of thought, freedom of choice, and freedom of expression to be pretty sacred, and to restrict those is a massive ethics issue.
Either way, no one is a citizen of Facebook or Meta. Those platforms can police their content in whatever lawful ways they desire, and if they want to police misinformation that’s no one’s business but their own.
The problem is we do have government putting pressure on tech companies to implement these polices. Zuckerberg has been infront of Congress multiple times. To me that’s just a loop hole.
And why can’t I have an opinion on how Meta polices their information?
People can still consume any information they like. But expecting and requiring Facebook or Meta to be that place seems pretty silly to me.
In this instance though Meta is downgrading their department.
okay, okay, okay, okay… So hear this… We don’t even hold our elected officials accountable for what they say, but we’re pushing restrictions on what citizens can talk about?
Fuck that shit.
People are pissed about Trump, and anti-vax, and whatever else, and are scared of the effect of misinformation, but have you notice our demographics haven’t actually changed? Neither Republicans nor Democrats really have a hand up in elections.
So why are we restricting people’s freedoms of what information they consume?
I’m no doctor, but what you’re describing would be consistent with ADHD.
Dude… Just no. If she was done with the relationship it was her responsibility to inform you. Don’t gaslight yourself just because it’s hard to be upset with her.
If you were in a relationship and she didn’t end it, and then proceeded to date someone else, that’s cheating.
She could have just told you, she chose to go behind your back. And it’s not because she was scared of hurting you, if that was the case she wouldn’t have cheated on you.
Good luck out there.