I only use work hardware for work. I only use work networks for work. I have a cell phone off wifi for everything else

Op why don’t you suggest what an acceptable reply looks like? You’re pretty restricted on what type of advice you’re seeking. Maybe then folks can ad libs in the thing that will help.

And ultimately if you are trying to macgyver together anti drone tech you are beyond fucked and should have spent that energy pursuing other means of privacy.

Super wholesome lol

https://youtu.be/X6OowkRjVLc

I would give Bernie Sanders a blood donation no question.

Edit I would give him a blood marrow donation no question. Aware of the discomfort and recovery.

I would legitimately consider giving him a kidney, after certain private conversations and understanding.

If I can source him a nice kidney, lemme call my guy

What about baseball and track?

Loser talk. Do you see the masturbatory way you are reveling in these negative responses? Will you acknowledge you are dwelling in hyper negativity, seemingly for the lulz?

The lack of understanding that indeed, you may struggle to control it, BUT YOU’RE STILL RESPONSIBLE FOR IT

I mean I need to keep some, guys

Yeah they probably welded themselves in the launch silos, no chance of abandoning post

Hey Bernie if you need some blood or a kidney or something lemme know.

19/f/Cali always

You think a person’s worth is tied to their genes. Pretty yuck. I disagreed and explained how.

For the record I was calling YOU out for linking a person to their genes, just not directly, trying to be courteous to the conversation.

Keep replying now, and you’re just slapfighting. Not worth it. I said in the last comment our positions are well known and the conversation is functionally concluded.

It’s a bad gene. It’s literally the contextually appropriate description of a factor involved in a situation.

Sorry it hurts your feelings

We’ve both made our points and opinions known here.

Why would there be communal ownership of personal goods? The stuff is alexi 's

I mean if it’s a damaged or failed it’s a bad gene. It caused ms!

It’s not shitting on a person, it’s discussing a condition.

I can understand that discussion can lead to eugenics style thoughts.

“Oh that person has tons of bad genes, they therefore are bad”. That’s wrong though, a person can have a super fucked up body but it doesn’t change their value or goodness.

When discussing a condition, the genes that improve or cause that condition can be described as good or bad.

Context matters.

Weird almost duplicate replies

Yes but those in the coops have their own possessions. Certainly if you try to take away something as basic as the food they intend to eat themselves they are going to have limits.

A co op for managing the profits and work of a business makes great sense. But even hard core communists want their own pants and shoes and would be reluctant to give away thier own needs.

Obviously a deal communes drive towards is provide based on your ability, be provided to based on your needs.

I think the meme pushes on the perception of the individual of their “needs” (real or hypothetical)

Edit the point is the meme is all about personal possessions, to use the keywords of the replies.

It’s an article about curing baldness, all context is pre determined.

Like sure, if we’re just bringing anything up, why care about baldness when I can’t breathe underwater, or if I can’t raise the dead?

They’d need flannel