Oh yeah I was thinking more along the lines of video games or movies where there are too many people creating it. For books, etc you can definitely donate.

There should be a way to pay only the workers when you buy something. In that case, you could pay them but only after pirating and making sure you enjoy it. Since there is nothing like that, I think you should pay only content from small creators. Big creators already have plenty, and paying for anything else just gives money to greedy executives who then lower the quality of the content to make more money. Of course, if you have the means and don’t pay anything, you are just making sure there will be less of that content made in the future. It isn’t scalable; if everybody pirated content without paying a single cent, there would be no content made except by hobbyists who don’t want to make a living out of it.

I really like to see communities like lemmy.film, mtgzone.com, and programming.dev and wish there was an instance about literature.

This has already been mentioned a few times. Just find the relevant issue on GitHub and give it an upvote.

• The rank of a post in the aggregated feed should be inversely proportional to the size of the community #1026
• Weighted Community Subscription for Customized Feed #3518
• Balance Instance Scores Based on Monthly Active Users #3642

I knew I recognized him from somewhere. He was the developer of lib.reviews. https://github.com/eloquence

I’ve saved this, but it would be nice to see the syntax somewhere in the search engine

This is so cool. It’s exactly what I had in mind when thinking of a modern bash alternative.

I like this idea, but I would suggest generalizing it to apply to any similar posts. That way, we can find the best answers to a question without having to open multiple posts asking the same thing.

Issue #1908: Merge comments from similar posts into a single view