True, but if you just got elected as the head of a US friendly nation, it probably wouldn’t be quite so unbelievable.
I think his main problem is targeting people who have already had funerals. There aren’t many that live to have a second.
I think you’re right about H&M, though I know a lot of fans did a rewatch after the passing of Matthew Perry, so could be a lot of that too.
Banned from lemmygrad? Impressive.
There appears to be a terrorist attack going on in Moscow right now and it’s not a rainbow flag attack.
Interesting take. In all of the defences of LLMs using copyrighted material it’s very often highlighted that “fair use” allows exactly such summaries of larger texts.
In reality, “fair use” is ruled on a case by case basis, so it’s impossible to judge whether something is or not without it going to court.
Is this bot a closed system which is being used for profit? No, you know exactly what its source is (the single article it is condensing) and even has a handy link about how it is open source at the end of every single post.
I don’t think anyone’s going to pay for your version of ChatGPT
[Citation needed]
Allegedly possibly maybe accidentally whoopsie not quite licensed fully material.
BRAIN MELTING
Looks kind of like a lemon.
What are they chopping off? He’s already all crown.
Side note: the King Ranch Super Crew sounds like a range of chicken burgers.
Aha, so you do have empathy for other living beings after all.
My point was that a bacon sandwich in particular is not a food need that’s hard to replace nutritionally by existing foods. People eat it because it’s super tasty. I would bet there is a very small percentage of total bacon eaten in the world that is eaten out of necessity (impoverished family eating their raised livestock).
It’s a bad faith argument to make the assumption that I think the change should happen overnight instantly. And it’s simply a bad argument that someone somewhere would have to eat meat eventually. It takes a LOT of crop farming to provide sustainance for the meat industry.
That’s the dumbest application of game theory I’ve ever heard.
This example would only apply if there were a finite amount of animals shared between the two people only and there were no other factors at play other than eating and being hungry. Additionally let’s assume the x is [eat animals]. This then defines the reason why people are telling you to not eat animals (the second x) as simply because “they don’t like it”. It shows you are missing the point entirely.
Don’t pretend your “you don’t like it so I’m going to do more of it” is anything more than “owning the annoying vegans who told me what to do”.
I feel like more people need to “forget” the /s
To quote my favourite comedian: Jokes should never end with “I’m Joking”