Workman

Could you please define exactly what you mean by “left-wing”?

[…] Solarpunk’s Pleasant Politics comm has an automod that bans and unbans based on recent karma ratios. […]

Do they have any documentation for that behavior? If so, could you link it?

Karma does not persist […]

I’m not sure what you mean; if I look at your account, for example, I can see all of your past vote scores ^[1].

OpenStreetMap Community Forum

Anecdotally, I have personally encountered a bug where my Linux system couldn’t handle the EDID from the monitor — so that particular model of monitor didn’t function with Linux despite it working fine on Windows.

Also seems the most useful cause you get two colors for the price of one.

Given my personal preference for the Uniball Vision Needle (not pictured), I’ll go for 1.

HA, that’s so cursed. I love it.

Avocado tree?

An interesting alternative that I’ve found (for when making English breakfast or something similar) is to steep the teabag in the milk first before adding the hot water. I find that it cuts down on the bitterness and makes a much smoother tea.

Thunder

[…] If you don’t support imprisoning people who hold these views that directly lead to the death of many innocent people, the taking over of people’s land/homes, the destruction of democratic systems, and the elimination of entire races of people from populations, then you are inherently tolerating their beliefs.

To me, it feels like you are conflating some things here: I draw a distinction between how I try to conduct myself (and, by extension, how I think society should conduct itself), and how I think a government should conduct itself. Any common overlap, while it may theoretically draw from the same core personal beliefs, is more of a coincidence in practice, imo. Yes, I think that society should not socially tolerate any of these behaviors, and I think that society should take an active position to socially oppose them; but I don’t believe that a government should take action unless the well-being of an individual is actively under threat.

I could be wrong in my interpretation, but all of your examples seem to simply a be a difference of opinion (no matter how abhorrent and unpalatable an opinion may be). I don’t believe that one should be legally punished for a difference of opinion. The only one that may have some legal ground, in my opinion, as I currently understand your examples, is

Supporting dictatorship, authoritarianism, or totalitarianism as a concept or goal

but that would depend on how you are defining “support”.

Zero. I believe that the negotiations of an employee’s market value are between the employee and their employer. I don’t believe that it is my responsibility to charitably subsidize a company through the subsidization of their employees’ wages.

Transphobic main dev […]

Do you have a source?

I swear, that text looks both blurry and sharp at the same time.

!trippinthroughtime@lemmy.ca

“The President has invited you to the Gulf of Laogai.”

How to Cure Fungus on Aquarium Fish

Am I going to be patient zero for an IRL Last of Us?

[…] If your ideology allows Nazis to face no legal consequences for being Nazis, while you simultaneously state that you don’t believe they should be tolerated, then you hold mutually contradictory views. […]

I think you’ve made a fair point. I think, in this case, it depends on how you are defining freedom of speech ^[1.1]. Freedom of speech doesn’t negate one’s freedom of association ^[1.2]; it simply states that one should be free to express themselves without fear of censorship ^[2]. Censorship requires active suppression of speech ^[3[4]]; I argue that if one chooses to not associate with someone, they aren’t actively suppressing their speech. So, more to your point, allowing the nazis to express their opinions is an exercise of freedom speech. Being intolerable of nazis is an exercise of freedom of association (eg choosing to not associate with them) and freedom of speech (eg vocalizing one’s distaste of them).

All that being said, this makes me consider whether, philosophically, one’s political positions also apply to how one personally behaves. I think it could be said that one’s political philosophies derive from one’s personal morals.