KillingTimeItself

see thats weird, i read that comment, not one mention of “naked kids” being there, just “kids” being there…

idk i’ve grown up around a family with various siblings, and my experience has generally been that doing much of anything with a baby, especially one that shits itself is often more work than it’s worth.

maybe this shits uniquely american, but i can’t recall anybody just changing their babies diaper in public. In public bathrooms sure (a car even? Though i don’t consider that public), there’s changing stations there, and it’s to be expected, but certainly not just, in the middle of a park.

hence why i said rude at best, because yknow, human fecal matter has never been known to cause disease and sickness in other humans. Let alone what kind of sanitary problems that would cause in most places.

Im sure people carry kit with them, but shit happens (literally) and i would certainly want to be in a bathroom rather than not be in one, because that way it’s atleast contextually contained and expected. Also do you not have a car? That would certainly explain some of this.

violation of privacy is often considered to be an extreme form of trauma for most.

That’s why it’s private.

how do you even know the kids are allowed to be nude there?

i mean, most people use bathrooms. Considering that human waste is literally a biohazard, i feel like doing anything else would be quite rude at best, and arguably a crime at worst.

i literally didn’t claim that, scroll up to one of my previous comments.

You show me an example of anyone suffering PTSD because their parents showed their partner baby pictures.

i literally provided myself as an example in this, i quite literally said that i would consider it a violation of privacy, and no that’s not PTSD, but PTSD is the extreme end of things here. We aren’t just talking about PTSD.

Based on that reasoning, I should not show anyone any photo of my child until they were old enough to consent to them being taken.

based on that reasoning i shouldnt expose my child to the visual perception of other people who exist outside in the chance that one of them non consensually perceives my child.

You wouldn’t expose your child naked in public, why would you expose them naked on picture?

I’m not embarrassed by my body and if that’s what her partner really wants to see, I don’t care.

that’s great, the implication there is that you’re still showing it to other people, and if we’re talking family and friends, i don’t know many people that would want that.

I’d fuck with atomic time, but at that point i want a perfect calendar system also.

if i can’t have anything nice, you can’t have anything nice, and only the people who can’t have anything nice will have something nice >:)

i didn’t take them and i didn’t consent to them existing either. Neither did i consent to them being shown to anybody.

Naked humans are also normal, yet we still wear clothes. babies included, weirdly enough.

At what point does “naked baby photos” turn to “naked children photos” is my question.

how about this. You can have your naked baby photos, you just also have to be in the photo and naked as well.

yeah, i just wanted to provide a few more examples i suppose.

username checks out.

(Fetishes aside.)

damn, you got me on that one.

Trauma and ptsd can be used interchangeably

the sky, and blue jeans can also be used interchangeably.

You wouldnt though.

we arrive at this conclusion immediately and without hesitation thanks to all the hard work of men thorought history.

you say this like women have ever had rights to the point that being ogled at “would be bad” the one argument here would be the “daughter is her fathers property” and that’s not really a gender thing, that’s a social custom about gender more than anything.

Unfortunately, circumcision is a particular form of mutilation that transcends cultures.

a lot of mutilation goes back centuries for human history. You can pick up any variety of mutiliation and it’s been done, scarrification, penile subincisions, foot binding, skull stretching, i can keep going.

Just because it’s historically common and pervasive doesn’t mean we should consider it to be normal. The aztecs commited human sacrifice, and we think capital punishment is bad enough that we need to hide it away from the general public and make it “sterile” which in reality means using a completely botched medical injection process.

also what culture “should be” does not determine what it is now, i’m not sure the legality of naked baby photos to begin with tbh, i’m pretty sure they’re still considered to be CP, unless legally stated otherwise somewhere. They wouldn’t count as CSAM i think, since there’s not abuse going on, but arguably it might count as CP still.

it’s still weird (source, i have parents), at least ask your daughter for consent first.

I’d consider it to be a breach of my privacy otherwise.

ok have fun bozo