• 0 Posts
  • 2.24K Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: September 25th, 2023

help-circle


  • democracy-like privileges

    I mean it’s not like we haven’t fought for those. Can’t expect someone to just give you these privileges. But more to the point, when I think of democracy it’s all those things that make up the whole. Citizen participation, citizen ability to affect things, free and fair elections, freedom of the press and so on. And I don’t mean those as absolute terms yes/no but rather as sliders that you’d use to gauge not if a country was straight up democratic or not but rather how democratic/how not democratic it is. And I’d say Finland is far enough into the democratic side that I’d say we do have democracy here.

    But tell me this… how many of the corporations Finnish people work for is democratically run?

    I mean a very significant chunk of workforce and economy works through cooperatives. And those have elections. Our biggest chain of shops is a cooperative, one of the biggest banks is also, there’s energy and forestry and so on. Out of 5,5 million people over 4 million are members of a cooperative. So not sure how many that’s numerically out of all corporations but when you consider the size and impact of them, it’s a big portion. Of course there’s the factor that we’re also heavily unionized and unions have both a very strong foothold and legal status. And those have elections ofc. But it’s different from cooperatives where you vote for stuff, if that’s what you were asking about.

    It’s all just the sort of stuff I’d say made up democracy. Saying there’s nothing democratic about Finland just feels weird and wrong. If we have nothing democratic, who does??







  • It’s a really weird situation they have with that

    Since the 1979 Revolution, the legal code has been based on Islamic law. Despite allowing sex reassignment surgery, homosexuality in Iran remains a crime punishable by death.[2][3][4][14][15] In Iran, this framework is occasionally viewed as a means to “correct” individuals who may otherwise express same-sex desires, offering an option to conform to heteronormative standards

    So being gay is punishable by death, but it’s fine if you go through gender reassignment surgery since that makes you a woman. With their attitude against gays you’d think they’d have similar attitude against sex change but I guess not.


  • I mean I’ve voted for a candidates in municipal, health care area, parliamentary and European Parliament elections. Hell, even in church elections. I’ve had friends as candidates, seen stuff get through from a single person’s suggestion through to reality through what I’d call democratic means and action, I’ve worked with different campaigns and parties and have seen change happen through that.

    If that doesn’t count as democratic then not sure what you consider democratic tbh because that’s the stuff I think of when I think of democracy.

    Is the new information clashing with your programming?

    It just seems to clash with the common definition of the word, is all. If democracy isn’t that sort of stuff then I wonder what it is and where you might find it, if anywhere.





  • The studies don’t actually show what you hoping that they show, that is that your run-of-the-mill person was better at knowing what issues they have. If doctor after doctor keeps telling you your issue isn’t what you think it is, you might want to consider their words. That’s all.

    Tell me again about how this hurt your feelings and what a mean lady I am for doing it.

    I’ve just been taught that assuming someone’s gender, skin colour and stuff like that is pretty yikes. I don’t mind rude though.


  • Your whole argument relies on that a medical professionals, plurar, would be more likely to be incorrect about a medical situation than a random hypothetical person based on how the person feels.

    If based on that I guessed you would be a woman of course most of the time I’d be right. But voicing such assumptions and going off on that seems like it’d be rude and detrimental to the conversation.