

I think frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml’s point is nothing but apologetics. I looked at the post they linked to, which helpfully highlights dog piling that was initiated by a couple pro-authoritarian communities:
cross-posted to:
According to the people doing the brigading, the article is only wrong because it was written by sources that are too Western for their nationalist liking.
It sounds like a helpful tool, but you might have to use some manual review because I don’t think an automated system can easily avoid all the false positives and false negatives.
I was experimenting with similar stuff that counts mass downvotes, and I think it yields some interesting results.