It’s pretty well known they were bred to be fighting dogs for blood sports. It doesn’t mean they end up that way, but intervention is needed in places other breeds do not require it.

The conversation is nuanced and long, but TLDR is that it is a breed which requires more training than other breeds. It’s also important to note that many owners’ version of training is ineffective or counter productive.

Pitbulls are highly energetic and much like great Danes, grow up physically much faster than mentally. They end up being an extremely powerful dog, chalk full of muscles, who crave constant attention and behave like a puppy. Well, puppies bite, and when a dog bites you, you tend to address it (give it attention). Compounding this, they’re also not very smart and it takes a while to train them. Compounding this further, they have instincts like all dogs where pushing is met with resistance (something Cesar talks about a lot with food etiquette around dogs), and basically everything they do is exaggerated with their enormous energy.

Comparing them to a breed like a Labrador, the obliviousness, energy, strength, and attention needs are not the same.

They can be very good dogs, but effort was made to achieve that. There are dogs who have been bred to be home bodies and they much more naturally fall into a “good dog” category. Pitbulls were bred for dog fighting and blood sports. This is not a good start for family’s first dog.

To put this into other terms. There are chickens who have been bred for cock fights. They can be good roosters, but watch your back and be ready to remove them if they attack your hens. That being said, predators beware. Different breeds have different specialties, if you want one for the look be very deliberate about what actions you are going to take to change the “natural outcome” of their behavior being the behavior you don’t want.

You’ll be dead, are you suggesting we become a necropacy? No wonder he likes the Kims so much in NK

Looks like a VPN into the EU is getting better for privacy by the day.

I believe what you’re looking for is a union, not a lawsuit.

You threatened their negotiators lives at the negotiating table. Fuck all the way off crybully bitch

From what I recall there were multiple fairly popular prophecies about what a diety or sign from the heavens were supposed to look like and Jesus recreated a number of them in the form of miracles. Doesn’t really speak to his mental status, he coulda been delusional in his insistance of his diety status or he could have been a grifter, or it could all be legit or whatever.

UK labour party and both parties in the US: This is fine.

I hope I’m alive for the trials. It’s obvious the victims largely will not be. Capitalism has stolen our humanity.

Pretty sure Chuck would let them through. So long as they were sufficiently zionist.

They could set up a green room mimicking the 4th celebration as a background. It’s not like anyone is there to dispute it.

It’s a shame how obvious the crisis is while capitalism insists on us all fucking around. Maybe we don’t all want to find out together. Too bad, we don’t matter.

They handwave at Pelosi and vaguely at congressional inside trading. Obviously the scale is beyond their feeble brains’ ability to comprehend earning 6m+ per day for his family of ghouls. That being said, insider trading has definitely applied a wet towel to Democrats’ ability to rally against blatant out and about corruption. This is another great example of why a particular type of Democrat needs to go away asap. But also an example of why we need to nationalize his properties to get our money back.

I hope Mitch and all the geriatric octogenarian dinos and conservatives will be there to show their support. It’d also make the place feel less empty.

Maybe Mitch and Trump will have one of those dual deaths where they’re only holding out for each other.

You are embodying the least likeable person in every workplace. They also always live in glass houses.

Buh-bye zionist bitch

Didn’t really address the argument. It’s not out of context and Google is free.

Your other argument is that it’s a slippery slope between not supporting a genociding ethnostate and not liking minorities in your own nation? Maybe when you’re an ethnonationalist. Do you think Lemmy is majority ethnonationalist? Are you one? Ironically it’s almost explicitly ethnonationalists that do support Israel because they can see the narrative of a, “successful ethnostate” as a justification for having their own, usually white Christian, version.

I have no idea where you’re seeing rampant antisemitism from the left, I highly highly suspect it’s actually from the right and you’re being bamboozled. If anything we often ignore the fact that there’s majority support for Israel amongst Jews because we understand there’s also a lot of jews standing strong against the genocide and we don’t want to antisemetically lump them all in the way people who talk like you often do, where you’re cagey about insulting a nation state to spare the feelings of Jewish supremacists or god forbid Jews who just like the place (I wonder why). I can freely say “fuck jewish supremacists” knowing anyone who would read between the lines to more than supremacists is not arguing in good faith anyways. Being a liberal identity politics obsessive person sounds EXHAUSTING dude.

Qatar? The same country we abandoned to protect Israel? Hope they enjoy the symbol of that betrayal.

I don’t believe that it actually entails any hierarchy beyond some new positions which amount to coordinators. It’s basically a free pass to allow millitary dollars to be spent through Israel though, except without contracts like someone like Blackwater would need and allows collaboration on all levels at the discretion of military leaders, which would naturally just be a compromised pedophile Trump, who acts as a unitary executive.