Oops. Looks like we aren’t repectful to eachother. Gotta report myself and you!

Blah blah blah nonsense words

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40832506

… Then how are you using software? If you don’t trust software devs, then how are you using it to argue with me on Lemmy?

… sigh You’re a pain in the butt. Look, maayyyybeeee there’s a simpler way to explain this, so if there’s someone oit there that thinks differently than me (that’s not val_ash@feddit.org), please do it. I often think too complicatedly

“You cannot use it in commercially, you cannot remove their payment stuff” Brother, is this not restricting the use of the source code?

Also, why do people trust security audits? Why do you trust the people who made the software for you? Why do you trust others?

No but seriously, I can’t explain it because it’s self-explanatory-only

Seems like you really don’t know about basic internet language lol

It’s not about opinions. Also, here’s a screenshot from RedReader

Just look at their products at “isitreallyfoss.com”

The word “spirit” can be used in many other contexts. Seems like you don’t know basic internet speech more than degoogling terms

Great explaination

I heard the modifying the source code is blocked

I heard that the liscense FUTO uses doesn’t fit into the OSS spirit (OSS stands for “open-source software”)

Liscensing is very important. It’s like a policy for the developer to obey. Liscenses that fit with the OSS spirit: MIT, any GPL liscense, Apache. They need the developer to compky that their apps’ code should be easily modifiable, be public, and not allow unneccessary trackers when on F-Droid or Flathub. Also, raw Firefox isn’t open-source because it doesn’t have an open-source liscense

FUTO’s apps do not have a liscense that fit with the open-source ecosystem. Because of this, I don’t count the raw Firebox browser open-source

Not an open-source liscense

Linux Mint is your answrr. Any flavor should work