At 77 I think it’s gone past normal and into a completely different weird niche.
- 0 Posts
- 136 Comments
Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.worksto Uplifting News@lemmy.world•Canadians are ‘leading’ in LGBTQ2 support amid global declines: Ipsos - NationalEnglish13·17 days agoShould wait until at least 2.3, there’s always a pile of bugs in the major version updates cause they want to get the update released on a marketing schedule.
Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.worksto LinkedinLunatics@sh.itjust.works•I think your daughter just wanted to know if you did well in schoolEnglish27·1 month ago“Usually, but I always made sure your mom finished too. Make sure anyone you date will do the same for you, sweetie.”
Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.worksto Celeb Economy@lemmynsfw.com•The Adventurer's Tavern repostEnglish1·2 months agoKeeping in mind that action economy is king, and two of a worse class generally still produce better results than a single superior class (exceptions exist, but are rare)…
I’ll take Barbarian and Knight for 300, Rogue and Assassin for 225, Sorceress and Witch for 225, And Druid and Shaman for 225, for a total of 975.
Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.worksto Uplifting News@lemmy.world•Tesla’s massive 71% profit loss pushes Elon Musk to limit government work with DOGEEnglish96·2 months agoYou know what bothers me most about the whole thing with Musk? The Twitter thing.
He was fucking around, he wasn’t really going to buy it, and some jackasses in the government and courts made him go through with it. Congratulations assholes! Because of forcing him to buy Twitter, right wing misinformation went bigger and had no checks at all on it (I mean it wasn’t great before, but at least they didn’t allow outright Nazi propaganda) and that was probably the major tipping point for the election.
So forcing Musk to buy Twitter led straight to this situation we’re in.
Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.worksto Technology@lemmy.world•Elon Musk, Jack Dorsey Call For Abolition Of All Intellectual Property Laws, Arguing There Are 'Much Greater Models To Pay Creators'English11·3 months agoElon certainly talks a good line, but his actions don’t really follow. Like, I agree with this, eliminating intellectual property would be great. I am sure that whatever actions he tries in regards to this won’t actually follow through and will instead somehow be twisted to benefit him at the cost of others.
Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.worksto Technology@lemmy.world•GenAI website goes dark after explicit fakes exposedEnglish452·3 months agoAi can combine two things. It can train on completely normal pictures of children, and it can train on completely normal adult porn, and then it can put those together.
This is the same reason it can do something like Godzilla with Sailor Moon’s hair, not because it trained on images of Godzilla with Sailor Moon’s hair, but because it can combine those two separate things.
Too much light for it to be a grue, it has to be pitch black for that.
Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.worksto Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•Least regrettable but most unconventional liquid to take a bath in?English7·4 months agoThere certainly wouldn’t be any regrets (because you would not have time to do so before death).
Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.worksto No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•why do transphobes mention pedophiles/compare them to pedophiles when most trans people (as do most people) hate pedophiles?English15·5 months agoSince at least the 1970s and probably much earlier, any and all non-heterosexual people have been painted as pedophiles by right wing / conservatives.
Indeed, a lot of the pedophile panic these days is driven by those people, because it is one of the few things they can get everyone to hate, and that hate often shuts down nuance and reason, and while real pedophiles are a problem, they want to expand that unthinking hate, that knee jerk ‘burn the heretic’ reaction to more people.
This is the reason we now see people attacking even completely fictional media, because they’re trying as hard as possible to slippery slope it.
So she’s a midget stripper wearing 2 and a half foot heels?
Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.worksto politics @lemmy.world•Trump Hilariously Fails to Play it Cool Over Time Cover of Elon MuskEnglish3·5 months agoNow show me where they’re paying attention to what they can’t do.
Like, how nobody can just access secure government systems without proper clearance, which the President can’t actually just give without procedure.
Or even more simply, the fact that Trump is not in fact currently eligible to be President in the first place due to his part in the events of Jan. 6.
I do not have confidence that they will be stopped by the fact that something is not permitted, because they aren’t being stopped by things that are not permitted, and if this continues for 4 years…there will be nothing left of the system that is supposed stop them.
Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.worksto World News@lemmy.world•Donald Trump is not joking about making Canada the 51st state, Justin Trudeau warns in hot mic commentsEnglish2·5 months agoIt would mean that whatever the US might hope to gain from invading Canada would be dwarfed by what the US would lose in the conflict.
The problem is this is already the case. Nuclear weapons may make it even more lopsided, but the country is already losing more than it stands to gain from an invasion purely on the economic results.
Something I’ve been thinking a lot lately is that democracy is a process. It is a means by which we attempt to ensure a just and fair government for all. It’s not an end in itself; we don’t want democracy because democracy, at least not once people really think about it.
Which leads me to a saying. “The ends do not justify the means.” This is a commonly held statement. However, it also works the other way:
The means do not justify the ends.
That means it doesn’t matter if something was done by the rules, using the process, it doesn’t matter if we voted for it, it doesn’t matter what process was used to achieve it. If the ends are wrong, going “well, it’s what was decided democratically” isn’t an excuse.
If one person or a few people have a definition wrong, that’s a thing that can be corrected.
If the majority of people think that’s the definition, and it’s been that way for decades, then you have the definition wrong.
Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.worksto Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•Can we stop asking people who are on the brink of death and suffering greatly to sacrifice themselves for a bunch of able bodied people who refuse to stand up and sacrifice themselves for the disabledEnglish7·5 months agoTo be fair, hasn’t made much difference cause one, he got caught, and two, nobody else has done it.
I don’t blame any particular person for it, of course. Hell, I share the blame myself. I haven’t killed any CEOs or politicians either.
But it’s not gonna work unless more of us gather up the courage Luigi had and take action.
Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.worksto politics @lemmy.world•JD Vance finally admits what Trump’s big plan to lower food prices is | The plan is no plan.English9·5 months agoNationalize the companies involved in production and distribution and eliminate profit, making and selling everything at-cost also works.
I like this template so much better than the Spider-Man one that people constantly use backwards.
Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.worksto Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•If money was not an issue, is there a movie, series, or a video game you would fund as a passion project with no intention on making a profit on it?English6·5 months agoThere was in fact a Dragonlance movie in 2008, Dragons of Autumn Twilight. I have not seen it to know if it was even a little bit good, but hey…there was one!
There’s a difference between ‘a person’ and ‘every person’. A person can definitely do things better than any chat bot. But not every person can. And depending on the situation, a person who can may not be available.
Even then, there is a place where the AI beats all persons and is better in one way: speed. If the task at hand does not require a better result than what the AI outputs, then the time savings is big, because there are no situations in which any human will work faster.