IMO, the most important parts are to document the actual intent of the code. The contract of what is being documented. Sure, it’s only so useful in perfectly written code, but NO code is perfect, and few will come through later with full context already learned.

It makes it sooo mich easier to know what is intended behavior and what is an unchecked edge case or an unexpected problem. If it’s a complicated thing with a lot of fallout, good documentation can save hours of manually lining up consequences and checking through them for sanity.

You might say, “but that’s indication of bad code!”. No. Not really. Consequences easily extend past immediate code doing things as trivial as saving data to the database without filtering, or having a publicly available service. Even perfectly coded things come up with vulnerabilities all the time due to underlying security issues. It’s always great to have an immediate confirmation of what’s supposed to happen whether it’s immediate code or some library with a new quirk in a new version.

I dunno’, this one’s quite a bit worse. 100 situps, pushups, and squats aren’t exactly easy like doing the alphabet. At least if someone did Saitama’s exercise, they would be in decent shape, just not a well balanced in shape.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Many people are giving wrong answers. Cognitive dissonance is NOT simply holding two opposing ideas in your head. Cognitive DISSONANCE is the uneasy feeling people are supposed to get when holding discongruent ideas at the same time.

Some people do not feel cognitive dissonance at all even while openly voicing the opinions. Great examples are all over politics. If one is for women having the freedom to make their own medical decisions, but oppose abortion bejng legal, those are two opposing views that SHOULD trigger unease and make them reconsider one position or the other.

A better example is people that believe laws should apply equally to everyone, but then go on to say Trump should totally be immune. That SHOULD cause dissonance, but it doesn’t for far too many.

Removed by mod

Hey! Don’t put the prequels in with the enshittified Hollywood! They were enshittified by George jumping the gun on a mostly CG movie and having too much control on the scripts/etc.

That’s totally different from executives demanding more runtime for more movies at a fast pace.

…The new sequels were definitely Disney enshittifying Star Wars, though.

I definitely remember some people screeing about Bush and Cheney wanting it, but IIRC, everyone was treating it like suspicion at most.

The Epstein conspiracy theory was accepted FAR more readily, but then that’s basically guaranteed to be true to some degree, even if it was truly just the jailors being incompetent fuckwits that wanted to take justice in to their own hands.

The only thing I remember people being remotely close to believing was that Bush was so incompetent that he allowed a terrorist attack to happen.

It’s not really a theory that Bush was an incompetent fuckwit, but it’s highly debatable if they knew enough to stop it.

Then get rid of the non-functional ziplock part altogether. That’d save way more plastic.

Wet bulb effect. That’s nearing fatal conditions. Humans die, guaranteed, in roughly 86F, 100% humidity (without a breeze), because sweat does nothing, and our warm blooded nature means the temp at which we overheat is less than equal to ambient.

No, it’s actually wrong and I was sarcastic. Just because a lot of the world is geared behind a patriarchy does not mean it’s suddenly OK to scapegoat the complexities of basic sexual attraction on to one gender.

“It’s more than the religious that take part in this” does NOT magically mean the social norms were not established by conservative fuckwits who were almost certainly heavily religious in order to protect themselves and keep their position in a patriarchy.

Conservative religions absolutely deserve most of the blame, regardless of which gender sat at the top.

Everyone is in ‘a’ class. It’s a classification of the populous. Do you work for money, or does your money work for you?

If you receive a paycheck or have to budget what so ever, chances are you are not part of the classification of shitbags that push the propaganda.

I mean, you seem to be assuming that muskboy cares about any of his children.

He just hates that one more because she exposes him for the hateful shitbag he is.

No, men bad! Must continue to fail to analyze society because men horny and men fault!

Where do you think the general fetishization comes from? Cultures that demonize the existence of breasts and shapely asses.

What cultures demonize breasts? Conservative religions.

In cultures that do not promote shame over basic sexual attraction, nudity is no big deal. You’re trying to put the cart before the horse, which is just… really, really stupid logic.

What do you mean? I’m totally supposed to be on Lemmy instead of working …

The justification is absolutely stupid no matter who attempts to use it.

They explicitly lose their protection if used for offensive military activity.

If soldiers are being treated in a hospital, it very much does NOT become a valid target. If soldiers are merely hiding in a hospital, it explicitly does NOT become a valid target.

Yep. All people need to do is remove themselves from the gene pool. Often that involves removing themselves from the count of the living, but some just sterilize themselves in some stupid way.