Twinnings is my usual. Pukka, mostly for herbies, and various supermarket ownbrands (not each of them’s cheapest ownbrand mind you). Yorkshire is decent, PG tips OK but I never buy the latter myself.

Guizhou Mao Jian (毛尖) of various brands is decent too, if you can find it. More commonly I love an English Breakfast, Earl and Lady Grey, Rooibos, and various herbal concoctions.

Edit: nicest brand of tea I had was TWG, and they were amazing. Too expensive for me to ever buy for myself, though.

It’s not.

It’s just reposting 4chan stuff. That post is fine, but look over the community and you’ll find a lot of punching down and the odd dog whistle post.

China Mieville and Ursula Le Guin are both up there are authors who have written things that have felt momentous to read.

But I’m not sure either of them could edge out Terry Pratchett as the author whose work I’ve enjoyed going back to time and time again, having read most of Discworld at a more formative age probably helps too.

I’m not sure the guy invoking Soros is meant to be taken seriously or sympathetically.

Edit: also the artist is the Jewish artist Eli Valley, apparently.

And this is why, little bushes, we must always have birds and give to them our first sprung berries on tribute.

Which creates a space where people with personal affiliations get away with it and gather. And then when called out on their shit, tell the “for the lulz” crowd that people are coming for their freedom.

It may be, but even knowing all that it is hardly helpful advice, and at least out of context and not knowing the people talking doesn’t seem to contain empathy or sympathy.
And is devoid of criticism of the actual leaker of the photos.

You’re not wrong.

But I also don’t think it’s a big delta in risk chance in a lot of cases, meanwhile in some parts of the world (looking at you East Asia) spy cameras are a huge problem.

There are, I imagine millions of nude photos taken that never leak.

I think a reason many feminists feel strongly on the issue is that it really throws society’s whore-virgin paradigm into relief, where women with sexuality are pushed to take the blame for their actions without much (any) consideration for them as people. Which is the reason “just don’t take them” gets the hostile reaction it does, and is a ridiculed response.

OK so because it’s selfies, so person 1 is responsible for her images leaking in a way person 2 is not?

Or do you feel that selfies are a level above and beyond just nude photos by virtue of having been self taken? If so, what sets nude selfies apart from sexy photos taken by a long term partner if anything?

I was interested in seeing if they felt differently about photos taken ones self in a ratively secure and trusted setting and then the photo was taken without permission versus an actual taken without permission.

OK, explain.

And if we’re talking about personal responsibility, to what extent you think it differs.

Person 1 takes some nudes and sends them to committed long term partner, long term partner’s cyber security is lax and Person C gets access to P1’s nudes and uploads them.

Person 2 has never taken nude photos, but unknown to them used a fitting room that Person D had hidden a spy camera in. Person D uploads these photos to the Internet.

How different do you think these two cases are?

Having done the research of going to the url on side the of the image, turns out the cartoonist does satirical cartoons that have been published in The Guardian and The Village Voice.

Whether the average person recognises this, (average probably varies by location quite a lot) I’m now quite happy to triple down on satirical.

I assumed it was ironic, to highlight how much worse off people in other countries are and thus humanising migrants, economic or otherwise.

Ah, the rare lesser spotted SFW Oglaf.

Yes, the process is unrealistic for comedic effect.

I probably should have explicitly stated I meant the conclusion. Perhaps this is the boss’s imagined thought process to reach that predefined conclusion that they announce at the end of the meeting.

Far too real.

I’m gonna find a way to share with as many colleagues as I can.

Thanks, it is fun to play with language. I almost went for the more boring “maculate”.

I find something comedic about a Germanesque mash of prefixes and suffixes. Maybe one day I’ll stumble across a newfangled word that can live in the cupboard of our collective vocabulary.

Would anyone or anything in heaven eat? Hunger is but a manifesting of the unimmaculaticity of flesh.