You’re lumping me in with a group I don’t identity with

You might not voluntarily identify with the other people who are just supporting yet another group that conveniently serves NATO’s interests, but so far there isn’t a good case for your favourite groups attempting to improve the living conditions in the Global South.

Hell, you actually admit that Mossad using such groups to (re-)subjugate countries in the Global South (and, thus, worsen the living conditions there) isn’t enough for you to drop support for them.

I’ve said repeatedly that I don’t support the war and that I oppose imperialism and yet you keep arguing as if I am in support of it.

You can’t claim that you do not support the war, and that you oppose imperialism (and, I assume, you also want to claim to oppose colonialism) while also supporting pro-colonial efforts that would only advance the imperialist and colonialist goals of NATO and opposing Global South states defending themselves against your empire.

You speak about Iranians as if they are hapless pawns unable to think for themselves

Where did I say that?
In fact, the people of Iran have been struggling against you with a significant degree of success.
If you meant that I do not support wannabe-compradors, then that’s not an issue of thinking that people can’t “think for themselves”. The issue is that I do not support those wannabe-compradors.

insisting that the only reason they would protest against their government is if foreign intelligence agencies directed them to

Nowhere did I say that. I even pointed out that even in the cases where such groups do genuinely want to achieve better living conditions for the Global South, their efforts will be utilised by NATO to actually worsen those living conditions.

The people I support are the Iranian people themselves

You (plural) say this, but every time it is some CIA/NED-backed group. And inevitably it turns out that the only reasons you (plural) do so, is because your empire told you that those are the “good ones”.

Even if the goal of Mossad’s support for the protests was to destabilize Iran in preparation for the US invasion, that does not make the protesters “pro-NATO forces,”

Yes, it does. They are literally used by NATO to maintain or strengthen colonial subjugation of the Global South.

nor does it mean women’s rights are nothing but a pretense.

For these groups, it is. Their actual goals are not to improve living conditions, but bring their countries under the heel of Washington.

While that’s certainly the case for Mossad, the protests were undeniably carried out by the Iranian people themselves to advance the cause of women’s liberation.

As in, the low-level members of the group thought that those were the group’s goals?

I never said I supported the invasion

You do support pro-NATO forces subjugating Iran for the benefit of invaders of Iraq and Afghanistan simply because of the pretense of “women’s rights”. The people that you support in this case do not care about women’s rights.

I said women’s liberation is a good reason for people to rise up against their government, which is what an insurrection is.

These people claiming that they just want women’s rights doesn’t mean that that is what they actually struggle for.

You are buying another round of Nayirah testimony/Iraq WMD and other such cases of propaganda.

What is needed first and foremost right now is liberation from NATO, as it is the most major barrier for improving, as whichever group will try to sabotage the Iranian government - even if it will genuinely want things like women’s rights - they will be used by NATO to just further (re-)subjugate Iran and wooden their living conditions.

Apparently this thread is being brigaded by the Russian/Chinese/Iranian bots

“Love” the racist dehumanisation from people who support invaders of Iraq and Afghanistan, the genocidaires of Palestine.

NATO: does the most NATO thing ever
NATO liberals: “what are we? A bunch of <insert current designated enemy ethnicity>?”

What evil shit did he do for the world (specifically US allies)

So, you think that the world begins and ends with the invaders of Iraq and Afghanistan?

They weren’t a reason. They were an excuse.

What you are actually supporting is invading and subjugating Iran.

Also, it is amusing how you (plural) keep speaking about women’s rights when as supposedly a valid reason to invade other countries (a la the white supremacist fairy tale of “civilising savages”) while your empire actually died stuff like the overthrow of the socialist government of Afghanistan that did improve women’s rights.

The chances are that you represent the invaders of Iraq and Afghanistan, i.e. NATO.

If you think that Piton is trying to reform the USSR, you are unaware about what the USSR was, and/or about what contemporary Russia is.

Is Ukraine invading russia? It is not. Is Ukraine commiting genocide? It is not.

It has invaded Iraq, Syria, and Iran at the very least, which helps the Pissraeli genocide of Palestine. It has also attempted to formally join the most prolific invader in the world, as well as to help NATO attack Russia.

Ukraine accepting peace to russias terms is no peace at all.

Of course a person like you, who supports the most prolific invader in the world isn’t going to support peace on terms not dictated by the most prolific invader in the world.
This just shows that you lied that Ukraine has no choice, and now you are trying to lie as if those peace terms were somehow bad.

The world already accepted giving Putin crimea.

Amusing how you don’t respect the wishes of the people of Crimea, even when NATO’s own studies concur that that is what they wanted.

But Putin wants more.

Everybody wants more. But, if course, you aren’t talking literally and actually mean some of your racist fantasies about your enemies being as bad as you.

If you give Putin more of Ukraine in exchange for peace, he will soon want even more and start another war.

You are just describing NATO’s behaviour, but imply that the rest of the world does not have a right to defend itself against you.

Your empire pushed for war with Russia. You don’t get to complain about being beaten.

Now, answer the question:
What should a state do when the most prolific invader in the world - NATO - starts amassing weapons and troops on that state’s borders?

People who say what you say have fundamental misunderstandings about how governments work and about how private companies (“businesses”) work.

It does seem acceptable to you, given your support for Ukraine invading Iraq, Iran, Syria, and attempting to formally join the gang of invaders of Iraq, Afghanistan and basically the rest of the world.

What should a state do when the most prolific invader in the world - NATO - starts amassing weapons and troops on that state’s borders?

Also, it is rich to call Russia “aggressive” when NATO was self-admittedly pushing for war with Russia.
It is similarly silly to claim that Ukraine is fighting for survival, considering that Ukraine could have just accepted peace with Russia during negotiations at many points, including in March 2022.