Pretty much everything you just noted is incorrect! The ecosystem is a giant cestpool of badly written annotation hell, there is no usable documentation whatsoever, The tooling makes the experience barely better than living hell and writing Java feels like doing things worse than any other programming language out there because the language devs have severe C++ PTSD and refuse any useful programming concept from that language outright!
You poor fool
Just because there’s a percent sign doesn’t mean it’s statistics, smartass. If I finish 4 tickets in the time I usually take to finish 3 tickets, then that’s a roughly 30% efficiency increase. That’s not statistics, it’ s just plain old elementary school algebra!
But don’t bother replying. I realize now that this post is occupied by human dregs that will be out of a job within the next 5 years because they refuse to interact with AI at all.
Yeah, that’s what I thought. Another useless AI hater. You people are even worse than the AI fanboy techbros! AI is a wonderful tool for those who know how to use it. It has increased my productivity by at least 30% and it can do all the mundane and boring coding while I focus on the interesting aspects!
Yes, that’s exactly the point. AI is terrible at writing code unsupervised, but it’s amazing as a supportive tool for real devs!
“Good code” is not well defined and your example shows this perfectly. LMDBs codebase is absolutely horrendous when your quality criterias for good code are Readability and Maintainability. But it’s a perfect masterpiece if your quality criteria are Performance and Efficiency.
Most modern Software should be written with the first two in mind, but for a DBMS, the latter are way more important.
No, it’s a car that breaks down once you go faster than 60km/h. It’s extremely useful if you know what you’re doing and use it only for tasks that it’s good at.
Docker is (simplified) a VM built from a single file. You can use it to host your website on a server that runs a docker daemon (pretty much guarantied nowadays). But it won’t be useful in developing the website itself.
But seriously, this sounds so much like a ChatGPT promt, why didn’t you ask that in the first place.
Codeberg has used way stricter rate limiting since pretty much forever. Nice thought, but Codeberg will not solve this problem, like at all.
I mean, really depends on the time period. Bugs are a surprisingly bad frame of size reference depending on the time period. Tha little insect might actually be human sized ^^’
Same. It’s a clear sign of either a badly written article or an AI written article (or both). Not worth my time!