Note that your link directs to the latest post. I think it is because of the /fap/. If that is removed it works fine. I think that’s a bit of a messy system that APOD uses.

I guess what he is talking about is that you linked the image (https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ image /2602/PIA20522enceladus .jpg ), but not the actual blog post (https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap260207.html (be sure not to include /fap/ in the link)) that include the textual information.

I am not sure if the image will show when adding the blog post as a link (instead of the image link), but when using the image link it is nice to add the blog post seperately. I think the blog post would be more valuable than the individual organisations underneath.

I commend you are adding sources! Thank you :)

^[1]

deleted by creator

The (tabbed) ui on macos looks so much better now!

Especially since mastodon is accessible for anyone, whether they have a mastodon account or not.

Time will tell. The words of AnkiHub are quite comforting, as it seems they are a small organisation focused on med students. It also seems they were surprised themselves with the offer they received when asking for collaboration.

They also say they will keep it open source 🤞

Firefox is adding an option to add notes to tabs. It is possible to enable it in beta and nightly (not sure about stable) with browser.tabs.notes.enabled set to true.

It can also be enabled in beta with browser.tabs.splitView.enabled to true.

I find the tab note function (browser.tabs.notes.enabled to true) very useful as well.

@Innerworld@lemmy.world could you please add the link to the source(s) to your posts?

I guess you are just pasting the Astronomy Picture of the Day in here, which is nice. But maybe link to the relevant post (or its original source), so that people not aware of this can learn from the added context the sources provide.

I guess OP found this in yesterday’s ‘Astronomy Picture of the Day’, which includes the link you sent. Would’ve cost a second to include it in the post.

Thanks! My opinion is that images from NASA, ESA etc should always link to the source. They always include interesting information about what is in the image. It is also nice if I don’t need to search the database for ages.

While US citizens pay for the tariffs, it may well hurt producers of imported goods.

“The adjustment occurs through reduced trade volumes , not price concessions,” according to the Kiel paper. “Given the choice between maintaining margins on reduced sales or slashing margins to maintain volume, most exporters apparently prefer the former.

Ah well… pedalling 😅

More like a moped, since it doesn’t require paddeling pedalling.

I share that sentiment.

It just doesn’t mean international law means you can shoot whatever you want out of your airspace, nor if a state should want to set that precedent.

There are a lot of other things to consider, like which branch of international law is applicable here (not humanitarian law/law of armed conflict as there is no armed conflict between the concerned states and Israel).

Customary law is to be very careful shooting down planes that violates airspace (which I doubt is the case here, as I expect they were allowed to fly through their respective airspace).

Netanyahu is also not convicted yet. And not all states agree with the ICC’s interpretation of head of state immunity.

There is some reality that needs to be taken into account, both that states have questionable views on Netanyahu, as well as that certain actions leads to unwanted consequences and/or precedents.

I’d rather focus on the fact that all states have an (erga omnes) obligation to prevent and concern themselves with the ongoing genocide, acts against humanity, and war crimes.

Finally, let’s hope Netanyahu sets food in a state that will abide by the warrant and we see him in the Hague soon.

While I am also frustrated that many European states do not take their erga omnes obligations serious in regards to genocide, do I think shooting down a plane on the basis of a disputed warrant would not be a proportionate measure^[1].

Generally planes can be ordered to land, but if they ignore that call and there is no further threat (like many Russian planes), they will generally escort these planes until they are out of the airspace. States do this based on the prohibition of the use of force as defined in article 2 of the UN Charter.

They are indeed tracked down by fighter jets and followed out of the airspace. My point was more that international law doesn’t allow a state to just shoot stuff, even after a warning, when there is no immediate threat.

You don’t just shoot down planes that pose no immediate threat, even though they contain people with warrants or are not allowed in the airspace.

Even Russian planes are not shot down when entering European airspace.