I do see it, but consistently call it out if I can. I like to use the example of POGS if anything regarding viral trends or whatever comes up. POGS were just printed pieces of cardboard that encouraged gambling, and we morons ate that shit up.

I had to go to the site to read the final one only for it to ask me why I bothered.

The missing arm is icing on the cake, even if it wasn’t intentional.

Gender neutral, but forgot their existed.

My brother had to tell me this when I needed food stamps after a decade of working, but felt embarrassed. They really pulled one on us.

Ha, jokes on them, I don’t make posts.

I mean, I agree, to an extent. As someone else pointed out, the cross banning would never work out in the US, and that shows the difference in how both things are treated here.

So, we can ban crosses? I’m obviously going a bit far, but both somewhat touch on the way people believe rights should be secured, and both involve human rights (one to free expression of religion, another to life and fr33dom from unfair treatment in general). Both make statements to others that others may find uncomfortable, depending on their beliefs.

Chato part chatokun name. Kun mean chatokun weeb.