data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/475b3/475b3c242a3086f913535081c8f53691ec8bf139" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6446/b6446867cdb2168bc8ef0ee6a9997baaeceefff9" alt=""
If other comments don’t get you sorted, Scrounger does it nicely. (if you trust some random site/ have no sensitive bookmarks; other options exist if not.)
If other comments don’t get you sorted, Scrounger does it nicely. (if you trust some random site/ have no sensitive bookmarks; other options exist if not.)
Biblically accurate hot air balloon.
Hmm. Are you asking in good faith, or to dogpile? Anyway, sure; I can explain why.
The Gruesome - clickbait because “if it bleeds it leads.”
Story - words like “story” are often plainly false when the article is a tiny blurb or fluff piece. Thankfully, this article is an actual story. But remember, it’s still bait.
of How - clickbait because it asks a question it doesn’t answer, baiting the headline-reader to click.
Neuralink’s Monkeys - oh, another Elon Musk altar. The press can’t get enough of Musk.
Actually Died - more bleeding leading.
Headlines can just be content, rather than a tease. This article title intentionally relays no new info.
Ah, so I was wrong. Gotcha.
Clickbait headline, no tldr? That’s a downvote for me dawg.
Police union furious, fighting for his accompanying four year paid leave to be bumped more appropriate five years.
Being that guy, first frame, “whence” means “from where.”