I hear that but ‘‘witnesses’’ who don’t understand the process are bound to cry foul even when everything is running smoothly. We saw it in 2020.
I hear that but ‘‘witnesses’’ who don’t understand the process are bound to cry foul even when everything is running smoothly. We saw it in 2020.
I needed a simple script to combine jpegs into a pdf. I tried to make a python script but it’s been years since I’ve programmed anything and I was intermediate at best. My script was riddled with errors and would not run. I asked chatgpt to write me the script and the second or third attempt worked great. The first two only failed because my prompts were bad, I had never used chatgpt before.
Why/ how? There is an application process and disqualifying criteria for a security clearance. The suggestion is that if you can’t pass that process you should not be let in on any confidential information.
No it was the opposite. Information laid out in his dossier continues to prove true over time as more details are released to the public. Not sure that anything has been shown to be false.
Most criticism you find is heavy on colorful language like “'fake news” and “common sense” but lacks any disproving evidence.
What point do you think you are making? You may need to reread the comment chain.
Policies based on their feelings instead of facts.
In the same speech in Wisconsin, Standifer described the strategy to train Christians as election workers as “a Trojan horse.”
What are you disputing? You can dispute inaccurate or fraudulent marks on your credit.
That’s awesome! Just wanted to get you to take a second look in case you were as diligent as my friend but it sounds like you’re right, then!
You sure about that? I have a friend who thought that too but found out 7 years later that only a bankruptcy will disappear after 7 years, not just idle delinquint accounts. He needed to actually file for bankrupcy to make it go away. This was in Usa, NY; maybe it’s different other places.
As a second “data” point: I have some accounts on my credit report that have not been touched in a decade+ yet they are still there (they are not delinquent).
Usenet? Most new media can be found there. The most copyright-contentious files are not on there for long so most folks use automated downloaders.
We’ve already solved this issue without biometrics. The manufacturers just cheaped out on actually implementing it in the affected models.
What do you mean? I never really see much about RFKjr but I don’t have him tagged as a topic of interest.
I’m not sure because I live in the US but the feed is based on “tags” you select. It seems like they process stories from around the world but I don’t have a grasp on how comprehensive they are, internationally.
I’m not familiar with MBFC. It may be similar but I don’t mind throwing some $$ at any project making these efforts. What I like about Ground News is that all the sources for a given story are aggregated to one page, sorted based on political bias, and rated on accuracy. That information combined with the “Blindspot” feature (which highlights when a story is disproportionately covered more by one side) is very powerful IMO. It looks like the blindspot feed it’s available to non-subscribers but doesn’t include the political bias of the source: https://ground.news/blindspot
Ground News. The blind spot feature gives me great insight to where my “out of touch” family is coming from with their political narratives.
That’s how replies are made from mastodon afaik.
I’m getting full speed (currently 290mbps on verizon 5g).
If we disallowed margin loans from brokerage accounts then the uber wealthy would be forced to pay more taxes. We can easily avoid impacting the middle class with marginal tax brackets.